Laserfiche WebLink
<br />j?~/ <br /> <br />BUDGET PROPOSALS from page 1..................................... <br /> <br />(To view the complete proposal, visit the <br />Department of Finance website at <br />www.ebudgetca.gov. To view Gov. <br />Schwarzenegger's "Strategic Growth Plan Briefing <br />Packet" go to www.aovernor.ca.aov.) <br /> <br />Fiscal Issues (Prop. 1A ERAF Contributions, <br />Mandate Repayment, Board of Equalization) <br /> <br />. ERAF III Concludes. The governor's budget <br />acknowledges that the $1.3 billion in annual contri- <br />butions from local governments to the state <br />agreed to as part of the Proposition 1A budget <br />package has come to an end. These shifts will not <br />occur in the FY 2006/07 budget In essence, they <br />will free up these funds for local programs ($350 <br />million for CDunties, $350 million for special dis- <br />tricts, $350 million for cities and $250 million for <br />redevelopment agencies). <br /> <br />. Mandate Reimbursements Resume for <br />Local Governments. The budget includes $98.1 <br />million for repayment of deferred payments owed <br />to local government for mandate claims prior to <br />the FY 2004/05 budget year. The state is required <br />to pay back approximately $1.1 billion over a period <br />of 15 years, pursuant to the FY 2005/06 Budget <br />agreement. <br /> <br />. New Mandates Unit. The proposal appro- <br />priates $537,000 financed from proposed mandate <br />cost savings for a unit within the Department of <br />Finance devoted to addressing issues related to <br />reimbursable state-mandated local programs, <br />including the development of policies and pro- <br />cesses to improve the mandates system, and <br />ensure fair and equitable payment of costs. <br /> <br />. Funding for Improved Tax Collection. <br />The proposal includes $1.1 million for the Board of <br />Equalization to undertake additional enforcement <br />of sales and use tax collections. The budget <br />estimates that this could result in an additional <br />collection of $13 million in local sales tax revenues <br />for cities and $5 million for counties. <br /> <br />. Mid-Year Budget Authority for Gover- <br />nor. The proposal includes language giving the <br /> <br />governor mid-year budget reduction authority. This <br />would allow the Director of Finance to reduce <br />General Fund appropriations if necessary to <br />protect the financial interests of the state. <br /> <br />. PTAP Grants Suspended. Continued <br />suspension of the Property Tax Administration <br />Program (PTAP) grants through FY 2006-07. The <br />PTAP grants are used by county assessors to <br />enhance their property tax collection efforts. <br /> <br />Transportation <br /> <br />. Proposition 42. Fully funded in the FY <br />2006-07 budget at $1.4 billion. The budget also <br />includes an additional $920 million as a repay- <br />ment of Prop. 42 (sales tax on gas) funds that <br />were borrowed in prior years. Although there is a <br />two-year "gap" in the existing statutory funding <br />formula for local streets and roads, cities and <br />counties will still receive $255 million for local <br />streets and roads from the repayment funds. The <br />governor has also proposed a constitutional <br />amendment that will permanently protect Prop 42 <br />funds in the future. <br /> <br />. SAFTEA-LU. The budget recognizes that <br />California will receive annually approximately 28 <br />percent more in federal transportation funding due <br />to the passage of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, <br />and Efficient Transportation Equity Act of 2005. <br />Over recent months, the League and CSAC have <br />worked together to request "an equitable share" <br />(approximately 60 percent) of the $208 million <br />increase in funds under the Equity Bonus pro- <br />gram to be allocated directly to local governments <br />for local streets and roads. <br /> <br />. Tribal Bonds. The budget notes that $1 <br />billion in outstanding transportation loans, includ- <br />ing Prop. 42 monies due from the suspension <br />back in 2003-04, remains dependent upon the <br />sale of tribal gaming bonds. Several lawsuits have <br />impeded the sale of the bonds. The budget <br />assumes the bond sale will now occur in the <br />spring of 2006. Should this become a reality, the <br />monies would be allocated as follows: $465 <br /> <br />Continued on Page 5 <br /> <br />PAGE 4 - PRIORITY FOCUS <br />January 13, 2006 - Issue #2 <br /> <br />Visit the League's Official Website-www.cacities.org <br /> <br />