My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agmt18 Economic and Planning Systems, Inc.
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agreements
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
Under 60 K
>
Agmt18 Economic and Planning Systems, Inc.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2021 4:40:46 PM
Creation date
6/11/2018 8:41:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Agreement
Contractor Name
Economic and Planning Systems, Inc.
PROJECT NAME
Assesment of value of City lot at Winslow and Hamiliton
RMP File Number
304.5
Date
6/6/2018
Amendment
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TASK 2: Sequoia Station Transit District <br />Step 2.1: Financial Due Diligence and Peer Review <br />The Consultant will review materials and documentation related to the financial structure <br />and projections for the Sequoia Station project. The EPS analysis will be designed to <br />substantiate claims by the project applicant related to the need for various land use <br />approvals, including density and height allowances. The EPS review will focus on the <br />validity of key financial projections and related assumptions provided by the applicant, <br />such as expected rents, project costs, and required return thresholds. EPS will compare <br />these assumptions and supporting information against prevailing industry standards and <br />readily available data to assess the validity of the applicant's claims and need for <br />requested approvals. <br />Step 2.2: Meetings and Deliverables <br />EPS will document the findings from the "peer review" conducted above in a technical <br />memorandum for City review. EPS will also participate in up to two (2) conference call - <br />type meetings with City staff to discuss key issues and findings. In addition, EPS will <br />participate in several meetings with the developer (up to 4 hours) to flush out key project <br />parameters, clarify key issues and data sources, and address outstanding questions. The <br />budget estimated provide below assumes that the project parameters do not evolve <br />during the course of the study. <br />Step 2.3: On-going Technical Analysis and Support (Optional) <br />Additional technical issues may arise during the course of the study that could change <br />the fundamental elements of the Sequoia Station project, including evolving market <br />consideration as well as revised deal terms introduced by the numerous project <br />stakeholders (e.g. the City, Caltrain, or other property owners). As noted, changes to key <br />project parameters are not anticipated in the technical analysis described above. As such, <br />the Consultant will be available to the City as requested to conduct additional analysis on <br />additional financial issues that may arise. The Consultant would also be available to <br />participate in additional meetings beyond those specified above. Should the City <br />determine that add-on analysis and support is needed, The Consultant will provide an <br />updated scope and budget accordingly. <br />Project Budget <br />A not -to -exceed budget amount of $10,000. The budget estimate covers all costs <br />associated with the tasks and meetings. <br />REV: 02-25-21 PR <br />ATTY/AGR.2021/Amend. No. 2/Economic Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS AMENDMENT NO.2 TO AGREEMENT) (Page 7 of 7) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.