Laserfiche WebLink
To facilitate subsequent evaluations in this report, the potential customers were grouped <br /> into four classifications: <br /> <br /> Priority 1 Customers: <br /> · Existing First Step Project customers (dedicated landscape irrigation meters) <br /> <br /> ,, Customers with agreements in place for service <br /> <br /> · Potential customers or groups of customers that have relatively large irrigation or <br /> industrial demands, and are adjacent to potential transmission pipeline corridors <br /> <br /> Priority 2 Customers: <br /> <br /> · Potential customers or groups of customers that have small to medium-sized <br /> demands, and are adjacent to or relatively near potential transmission pipeline <br /> corridors <br /> <br /> Priority 3 Customers: <br /> <br /> · Potential customers or groups of customers with relatively small demands, that' <br /> are either remote from potential transmission pipeline corridors, or may have <br /> higher customer site retrofit costs <br /> <br /> · Proposed future developments or redevelopment sites, or existing customer sites <br /> that are served by private wells or the California Water Service Company <br /> <br />Priority 4 Customers: <br /> <br /> · Landscaped sites that are not presently irrigated or other uses that have very Iow <br /> demands <br /> <br /> · Sites that are very remote from potential transmission pipeline corridors, require <br /> significant additional pumping because of site elevation, or appear to have very <br /> challenging/expensive customer site retrofit costs <br /> <br />Priority 1 and 2 customers represent the most viable customers that are ready to be <br />served, if the City implements a mandatory use ordinance or obtains individual <br />agreements for service. The annual recycled water demand from Priority 1 and 2 <br />customers represents the most reasonable minimum estimate of potential "new water <br />supply" for integrated water supply planning. Some portion of Priority 3 customer <br />demands appear able to be cost-effectively served, however, service in many cases is <br />dependent upon establishing institutional agreements to replace a current water <br />supplier or future development or redevelopment activities. Priority 4 customers do not <br />appear viable for a number of reasons. Although they were considered initially, their <br />demands do not appear to be a source of "new water supply" for the City. <br /> <br />Water Recycling Feasibility Study for Redwood City <br /> <br /> <br />