Laserfiche WebLink
Table ES-t: Recommended Project (Alternative D) Capital Cost Summary <br /> <br /> Item Description Cost <br /> 1 Storage and Standby Potable Connections $ 5,704,000 <br /> 2 Pumping $ 1,320,000 <br /> 3 Transmission Pipeline $ 15,248,000 <br /> 4 Special Crossings by Jack and Bore $ <br /> 5 Treatment Facilities $ 1,636,000 <br /> Subtotal Facilities $ 23,908,000 <br />6 ] Service Connections and Retrofit (10% of Facilities Cost) $ 2,391,000 <br />Subtotal Facilities & Connections $ 26,299,000 <br />Engineering, CM, and Administration (20%) $ 5,260,000 <br />Contin~lenc~/(20%) $ 5,260,000 <br />TOTAL $ 36,819,000 <br />ES.5 Implementation Strategy <br /> <br />The basic implementation strategy for Alternative D water supply and capital improvement <br />program is summarized in Table ES-2. The implementation concept is to simultaneously build <br />backbone infrastructure facilities such as treatment, pumping, storage and transmission <br />pipelines, while aggressively preparing in detail for customer connections and site retrofit. <br />Ba~ed on the experiences of other Bay area projects, customer coordination and site retrofit <br />requirements are typically underestimated, and actual recycled water use has fallen short of <br />odginal projections. <br />The proposed project could be implemented in multiple phases. Treatment, storage, pumping, <br />and pipeline transmission facilities to serve the Redwood Shores Area could be constructed in <br />fiscal year (FY) 2003/2004, and customer services and site retrofits could be constructed over a <br />three-year period between 2003 and 2006, so full supply benefits are obtained during the 2007 <br />irrigation season. The Greater Bayfront Area prOject phase may be driven by future developer <br />schedules, but it is tentatively planned that the 5-mile transmission line from SBSA to the <br />Whipple Avenue/Highway 101 Interchange could be in place by the year 2006, while the entire <br />Greater Bayfront Area could be served by 2009. In this scenario, the entire Alternative D project <br />could be in place by 2009, which may be advantageous to the City as the Master Sales <br />Agreement between San Francisco and suburban purchasers will be renegotiated in 2009/2010 <br />(contract expiration). <br /> <br />Water Recycling Feasibility Study for Redwood City xii <br /> <br /> <br />