My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2002-08-26
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2002
>
AgdaPkt 2002-08-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:53:51 PM
Creation date
8/22/2002 3:02:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
8/26/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
220
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
August 9, 2002 <br /> Issue #30-2002 <br /> <br /> Hot Bills: SB 910 UPDATE: HEARING CANCELLED- FOCUS NOW SB 874 <br /> · . ·. Act NoW The League learned late Thursday afternoon that Senator Dunn wilt probably "gut <br /> -' AB 1717 (Cancia~lla)- and amend" his Senate Bill 874, a redevelopment bill that had been sitting on the <br /> · Public P, eso[rce~ Senate floor, to incorporate provisions in his Senate Bill 910 relating to general plan <br /> "- Prohibited Uses- housing elements. For more, see page 2. <br /> ." SL~T (Gov's .................. <br /> <br /> BUDGET STALEMATE CONTINUES <br /> <br /> · Preemption of Ieee__! With the full legislature back in session this week, there have been several <br /> · /i~thorit7. Second· attempts by the Assembly to pass new versions of a budget deal. Early in the week, <br /> _' Units ~ Density Assembly Democrats produced a list of possible budget cuts as alternatives to the <br /> · Bonuse~ - Oi~OSE reinstatement of the Vehicle License Fee (VLF) and other revenue enhancing mea- <br /> sures contained in the Senate-passed version of the budget, to which Assembly <br /> AB 2292 (Durra). State Republicans have objected. The Republicans rejected these cuts, however, as not <br /> · Preemptk~ of Local fully addressing their concerns for solving the budget through a combination of <br /> _' Authority. Residential deeper program cuts and long-term structural reform. For more, see page 2. <br /> <br /> · NO VOTE FOR SACRAMENTO SALES TAX REALLOCATION BILL <br /> <br />· · A heated debate on AB 680 (Steinberg - Sacramento) occurred in the Senate Local <br /> · Government Committee Wednesday. Large numbers of local officials from through- <br /> · out the state showed up to voice their opposition to Assemblyman Steinberg's <br /> Want more details on controversial bill. This bill proposes to redistribute the Iocat sales tax in the Sacra- <br /> these and other bills? Log mento region and dedicate the amount redistributed to regional priorities. For <br /> on to the League of <br /> California Cities Web site more, seepage 4. <br /> <br /> at www.cacities.org and <br /> click on Legislative <br /> Advocacy. <br /> Page 3 · LOCAL Outreach Continues as Budget Stalemate Drags On <br /> Page 4 , How Is The Budget Impasse Hurting Your City? <br /> · Treasurer Announces Community Reinvestment Seminar <br /> ILSG Adds Charter City Section to Web Site <br /> Page 5 · Highlights of the League Board Meeting: July 26-27, 2002 <br /> Page 6 · State Seeks Local Input on Energy Efficiency Loans <br /> Waste Board Sponsors Food Residuals Diversion Summit <br /> · : ' , Legal Advocacy Report Available Online <br /> ..... page.7 · Legislative Bill Summaries <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.