My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2002-08-26
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2002
>
AgdaPkt 2002-08-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:53:51 PM
Creation date
8/22/2002 3:02:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
8/26/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
220
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
BUDGET from page I ............... TRIAL LAWYERS PROPOSE <br /> TORT "UN-REFORM" <br />As the state budget impasse continues, cities, counties <br />and other local government units throughout the state As we enter the last weeks of the legislative session, the <br />report increased pressures as they try to balance their own Capitol is buzzing with rumors about a new approach the trial <br />budgets with stretched local resources, and great uncer- lawyers may attempt to advance their tort "un-reform" agenda <br />tainty about state funding. One city manager reported that - which so far this year have been stalled both by extensive <br />the importance of state funding to their small city meansnegotiations on some bills and bleak futures for others, Rather <br />that they cannot pass a city budget until the state budget is than move individual bills, allowing legislators to vote up or <br />passed, down on each one individually, rumors are that the trial <br /> lawyers may try to include a number of bills in an omnibus <br />In San Diego County, which last week was battling a package or link individual bills all tegether. This would force <br />huge 57,000 acre fire in the mountainous east county area, legislators to vote for all or none - regardless of the mix of <br />the City of Poway reported that they have two fire stations options. <br />and 12 positions on hold until they know they can count on <br />their funding from the Vehicle License Fee backfill. (Many Of significant interest to cities is the proposal that would <br />Poway homes are located in hilly areas that are highly make it unnecessarily difficult for defendants to obtain <br />vulnerable to wildland fires.) summaryjudgmant (i.e., the judge dismisses the case) for <br /> unmeritorious cases, While this is currently included in SB 476 <br />Many county and regional programs are cutting (Escotia), opposed by the League, it likely will appear in another <br />essential services now, unable to sustain program services in bill as part of the above strategy or procedural issues. The <br />the absence of ongoing funding. For example, CAL Grant proposed limitations on summaryjudgmeot would even apply <br />Funds are not going out, causing a direct impact to residents in cases of a frivolous, unmeritorious lawsuit where the <br />in cities throughout the state, plaintiff pleads facts that cannot be proven, By severely <br /> restricting the circumstances under which a defendant may <br />Increasingly it becomes clear that, while the state can <br /> seek a motion of summaryjudgmeot, SB 476 (or its successor) <br />move forward concurrently and begin planning for next would encourage continued frivolous lawsuits, expensive <br />year (such as the Governor's call for state departments to litigation and drain resources from public agencies. <br />submit recommendations on 20% cuts), local governments <br />are stalled because they cannot determine their fiscal It is likely that the new package may also include a <br />situation for the current year until the state closes itsprovision to extend the statute of limitations for filing personal <br />budget. Cities want to work on long-term plans for ex- inju~j lawsuits, This also could have an impact on local <br />pected deficits in the future,just like the state is beginning governments. <br />to do, but their hands are tied. Every day lost in this <br />process represents potential lost revenue/services in theIt is not clear at this time when these bills or concepts will <br />future, nDve ahead, given the end of session time constraints, games <br /> and procedural options. Current indications are that these <br />Whether they are currently adopted, in the <br /> issues will be heard in the Assembly Judiciary Committee mid- <br />process of being adopted, or completely stalled, city next week. All cities should immediately call and write their <br />officials are urged to include in their public state- Assembly Members and Senators and urge them to vote NO on <br />ments about their own budgets information abeu~ hew ANY bill that includes a limitation on when a defendant can <br />the state budget impasse has affected or is affecting seek a motion of summaryjudgment. <br />local budget decisions at the local level. <br /> <br /> (Sacramento Bee columnist and political observer Dan <br /> Walters did an interesting piece on this issue today, If your <br /> local paper doesn't carry the Walters column you can read it on <br /> For more information On these and other the Sacramento Bee's Web site, at www.sacbee.com. Look for <br /> important topics for California cities, visit thethe August 16 column. ) <br /> League's Web site, ~,cacities,org <br /> <br />Visit the League's Official Web $iteo-www,cacities.org PRIORITY FOCUS/PAGE 3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.