Laserfiche WebLink
Legislative Bill Action <br /> <br />park owner took the issue to court, claiming that ness is to provide contract security guards). <br />the city council did not have the author~ to im- Proprietary secudty guards are those employed by <br />pose more stringent requirements. A lower court a private business or public agency. This bill <br />denied the park owner's petition, but earlier this would therefore require all security guards em- <br />year, the Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed ployed by a pdvate agency that do not carry a <br />the decision (El Dorado Palm Springs, Ltd. v. City deadly weapon to register with the Bureau of <br />of Palm Springs, et al., and El Dorado Mobile Security and Investigative Services, and also <br />Country Club Homeowners Association), ruling abide by specific training and weapons mainte- <br />that the city was limited to the scope of existing nance requirements. The author is attempting to <br />law. in May of this year, the League's Legal minimize the employment of private security <br />Advocacy Committee filed an amicus brief urging guards with criminal histories by subjecting private <br />the Fourth District Court of Appeals to grant the security guards to existing background check <br />City of Palm Springs' petition for review of the processes applied to employees in one segment <br />case. However, the appellate court had stated in of the pdvate secudty guard arena. Implementa- <br />its reversal that any question of broadening exist- tion of this bill is scheduled for January 1,2004, <br />lng law should be dealt with by the Legislature, not and the author has expressed a willingness to <br />the court. This bill is designed to respond to the address public agency concerns during the next <br />issue by ensuring that more than 50 percent plus session. Please notify the League regarding the <br />one of the residents have to purchase their sites extent to which your city utilizes proprietary secu- <br />before a park is considered conerted to resident rity guards. Staff: Natasha Fooman, Status: <br />ownership. Staff: Dan Carrigg, Status: SenFIr, SenFIr, Position: Review and Comment, <br />Position: Support, <br /> <br /> For legislators'phone r~nbe~ addresses and e-n~il <br />ADMINISTRATIVE <br /> <br />SB 994 (Morrow). Skateboard Park Liability. are listed under "Resources." <br />This week the Senate concurred in the Assembly <br />amendments to SB 994 and sent it to the Gover- <br />nor for action. SB 994 extends the sunset in <br />existing law that provides limited liability protection <br />for public agencies that have skateboard parks. <br />The bill has received widespread local govern- <br />ment support and has no opposition. Cities are <br />encouraged to send letters to the Governor asking <br />that he sign SB 994. Staff: Yvonne Hunter, Sta- <br />tus: On Governor's Desk, Position: Request <br />Signature. <br /> <br /> PUBLIC SAFETY <br /> <br /> AB 248 (Correa). Private Security Services. <br /> AB 248 subjects proprietary security guards to the <br /> registration and regulation provisions in current <br /> law that apply to guards working for pdvate patrol <br /> operators (i.e., those agencies whose sole busi- <br /> <br /> Visit the League's Official Web Site--www.cacities.org PRIORITY FOCUS/PAGE 11 <br /> <br /> <br />