Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2006 Council Priorities Workshop <br /> <br />* Capturing of ideas was not so good, and people felt ideas weren't represented at times <br />* Need more folks <br /> <br />3. How can this process be improved? <br /> <br />* Get more people involved - Do we need to up these sessions and take them to where people are? (i.e. <br />Senior Center, Schools,) <br /> <br />* More often - Membership on Committees <br />* Good as is <br /> <br />* Better communication with members of community - attendance a bit skimpy <br />* More coffee - more ca ke <br /> <br />* Did you think people would be inhibited if Council members were present? <br /> <br />* Practice <br /> <br />* It was well run, our facilitator at our table did a great job (Shauna) <br />* Council members could have "opened" and then left if needed <br /> <br />* Smaller group <br />* More publicity - newspapers - in the local TV channel <br /> <br />* Let us do our chart <br /> <br />* Keep doing it - use all avenues of communication to inform the citizens of these <br />meetings <br /> <br />* Ask the question: "What do you want for Redwood City?" without leading the question, and put it in everyone's <br />water bill <br /> <br />S:\Community Meetings\Community Workshop on City Council Priorities\Council Priorities Workshop January 18 - Evaluations <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />2 <br />2 <br /> <br />2 <br />2 <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />-c <br />Q) <br />CC <br />CD <br />~ <br />en <br />