Laserfiche WebLink
6A.C. - Page 21 <br />standard relocation assistance requirements as set forth in a provision that was <br />part of the ordinance introduced by the Council on March 26. <br />• Section 42.5(A)(2), added "The costs of a rental agency shall be fair and <br />reasonable based on current market pricing," to avoid excessive costs to <br />landlords associated with this ordinance. <br />• Section 42.6(6), added "with an entity qualified to provide escrow services within <br />the State of California" to ensure that all applicable State regulations would be <br />followed while providing the relocation benefit on behalf of the landlord. <br />In addition, both ordinances have been revised to correct typographical errors and/or <br />provide clarification to ordinance section titles. <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />The City Council could recommend changes or alternatives to the proposed ordinances. <br />FISCAL IMPACT <br />The fiscal impact of these ordinances will include the cost of staff time to enforce the <br />ordinances. The Minimum Lease Terms ordinance will require staff to develop new <br />public outreach communications and provide enforcement as necessary. The <br />Relocation Assistance Ordinance will include the cost of staff time to implement the <br />provisions of the ordinance including reviewing relocation assistance applications and <br />identifying a relocation assistance vendor. A fee for staff time will be determined through <br />the preparation of a Nexus Study. Once the City Council adopts the fee, the fee can be <br />used to offset expenses to administer the requirements of these ordinances. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW <br />Adoption of the Minimum Lease Terms ordinance is not a project within the meaning of <br />the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because the ordinance is a <br />government mechanism that does not involve any commitment to any specific project <br />(CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4)). Even if adoption of the ordinance were a <br />project, it would be exempt from CEQA because it can be seen with certainty that there <br />is no possibility that the ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment <br />(CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3)). <br />