AgdaPkt 2018-08-27 Joint SA PFA - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

6.1.F. - Page 8 C. The design and proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage, or substantially and avoidably injure fish, wildlife or their habitat, or cause serious public health problems. The merger of the seven existing parcels into a single parcel would not cause substantial environmental damage, injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, and would not cause serious public health problems because the site is located within an urbanized setting. The site contains an existing office building and a private paved surface parking lot. No new development or site changes are proposed with this Tentative Map application. D. The design or improvements of the proposed subdivision will conflict with essential public easements for access through, or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. The merger of the lots would not conflict with any essential public easements for access through, or use of property within the proposed parcel. The proposed lot merger would maintain an existing storm drain easement and create a new public utility easement along the Hazel Avenue frontage as requested by PG&E. No new development or site changes are proposed with this Tentative Map application. E. Such other findings of conflict with written public policy or with the public interest as the Planning Commission may determine. The proposed project does not conflict with any written public policy or with the public interest. CEQA STATUS The proposed activity is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3). The activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment, and it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. The activity in question is the fulfillment of a previously approved condition of approval, and there is no physical change to the site being approved by the Tentative Parcel Map, or the existing building located on the site. Staff RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Subdivision Committee approve the Tentative Parcel Map, subject to the findings and conditions of approval. Seth Adams, Associate Planner ATTACHMENTS 1. Tentative Parcel Map 2. Draft Conditions of Approval Page 3of3