Laserfiche WebLink
5 - Strongly support. Yes, let's wait until results of the next election. Opponents sound like they <br />want to jam through more development while there is a sympathetic City Council. <br />S. Development plans, zoning restrictions, and building guidelines are very important in RWC <br />today. Council members established and newly elected are responsible for these decisions. <br />Let's vote for council members that understand the issues important to the residents!. <br />5 if there are vacancies they should wait until November's election. Appointing someone now <br />would only allow the old members to continue to control our city. Let the appointment <br />happen after with a fresh beginning. <br />4 1 can see both sides but since the planning commissioner is appointed for some time I would <br />think it's better if new City Council will appoint him/ her. Those 3 months wait isn't too much in <br />the long run <br />5. Less than 90 days we should wait <br />5- wait until after nov election makes sense <br />4, given that the November election is close at hand, it will be valuable for any changes to the <br />council to be reflected in the appointment. <br />5, 1 support the ampex sign <br />5 - definitely wait. We need new blood in the City Council. The current Council has made a total <br />mess of downtown RWC. We should also consider hiring a professional urban/city planner who <br />actually has knowledge & experience of city planning. <br />S. Since we will have many new faces on Council -City should wait until after they are seated to <br />appoint a new commissioner. <br />5; 1 support keeping the Ampex sign. <br />5. Makes seance. Why not. <br />