My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 2001-02-26 Reg
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CC Min 2001-02-26 Reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:42:09 PM
Creation date
3/12/2002 10:06:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
2/26/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commissioner Rosanne Foust addressed the issue of preserving the commercial <br /> centers in the City. She stated discussion was around not changing the existing uses but <br /> how to protect it and move forward. The focus is to have retail in the downtown and create <br /> housing to be a part of the outskirts. The neighborhood commercial centers such as Canyon <br /> Road, Marsh Manor, Bridgepoint Plaza and how they would be impacted was studied and <br /> how those areas might be developed in the future to include a housing element. <br /> <br /> Planning Commissioner Tamara Piulle stated that parking is a balancing act where on the <br /> one hand enough off-street parking reserves must be provided and on the other hand <br /> uncontrolled parking must be restricted. Employers must be encouraged to develop <br /> alternate transportation modes. The two tier parking system being recommended will better <br /> address the often-different parking needs of businesses due to the number of employees, <br /> trips generated and location in the community. <br /> <br /> Associate Planner Ekas gave an overview of the public review process and described <br /> various terms such as Floor Area Ratio (FAR) and grandfathering. She explained the <br /> various housing incentives that include mixed use commercial corridors to have FAR <br /> bonus for the provision of housing; neighborhood shopping centers redevelopment <br /> incentive for residential units on the second story; the Downtown would allow housing on <br /> the first floor of the CB and Central Administrative (CA) zones and Single Room <br /> Occupancy (SROs) within 1,500 feet of CalTrain Depot and within the entire CBR zone. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ekas explained the second principle to be preserving industry. She stated that General <br /> Industrial) Gl is the heaviest industrial zone and the proposal would allow a FAR of 10% <br /> for office uses and the office would be accessory to the industrial use. No FAR would be <br /> implemented for the industrial use itself. The medium industrial (IR) proposals include a <br /> total FAR of 70% for industrial uses as well as other permitted and conditional uses, and a <br /> 35% FAR for commercial uses. Office uses would be allowed in conjunction with any <br /> permitted or conditional use and would be allowed to occupy up to one third of the FAR or <br /> a maximum of 35% FAR in conjunction with the other use. The light industrial (IP) calls <br /> for a 40% FAR. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ekas continued with the third principle of preserving commercial centers for <br /> pedestrian oriented uses on the first floor. Neighborhood shopping centers to be <br /> neighborhood serving and office size limitation on the first floor would allow a maximum <br /> of 25% for office use, resulting in 75% of the first floor area in retail and service types of <br /> retail to preserve the orientation of those centers. <br /> <br /> The last principle of providing adequate off-street parking discussed was for sites within <br /> 1,500 feet of the CalTrain Station to have 3.3 stalls per 1,000 square feet. Sites outside <br /> 1,500 feet to have 4 stalls per 1,000 square feet for smaller offices and 3.3 stalls per 1,000 <br /> square feet for larger offices. <br /> <br />REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 26, 2001 <br />MINUTES PAGE 6 <br />MINUTES Book No.58 <br />Page NO. 359 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.