My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2018-09-10 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
AgdaPkt 2018-09-10 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2018 8:39:31 AM
Creation date
9/6/2018 5:49:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
9/10/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
468
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.1.C. - Page 53 <br />e) In addition, estimated information for all projections regarding the next 10 fiscal <br />years set forth in items (a) through (e) above should be presented using a Discount <br />Rate that is 1 percentage point below CalPERS' then -current Discount Rate. <br />R3. The Grand Jury does not recommend specific policies or implementation measures to <br />address pension costs. However, it recommends that, by no later than December 31, 2018, <br />and annually thereafter, each City instruct its staff to deliver a report to the City Council in <br />connection with the City's financial plan evaluating available options to address pension <br />costs and that each City hold public hearings to discuss and consider such options no less <br />than every other fiscal year. These include (but may not be limited to): <br />• Regular supplemental payments to CalPERS (beyond those required by CalPERS) <br />to accelerate the amortization of their Unfunded Liabilities. <br />• Irregular supplemental payments to CalPERS (beyond those required by <br />CalPERS), as when a City has a budget surplus or receives special non-recurring <br />revenues. <br />• Electing to apply shorter Amortization Periods (that is, less than 20 years) to their <br />Unfunded Liabilities. <br />• Issuing pension obligation bonds. <br />• Establishing substantial reserves that can be applied in the future to help meet <br />rising pension costs and/or accelerate amortization of Unfunded Liabilities. <br />• Establishing Section 115 trusts for the exclusive purposes of meeting rising <br />pension costs and/or accelerating amortization of Unfunded Liabilities. <br />• Reductions in general fund operating costs other than pensions. <br />• Seeking additional general fund revenues that can be applied directly to paying <br />pension costs or that can offset general fund budget shortfalls that would <br />otherwise occur. <br />• Keeping employee salary increases at or below the levels assumed by CalPERS. <br />• Negotiating cost-sharing agreements with employees under which employees pay <br />a portion of the City's pension costs (without at the same time agreeing to <br />offsetting compensation increases). <br />• Maintaining growth in employee salaries and COLAs at or below the assumed <br />CalPERS rates. <br />• To the extent allowed by law, consider the recommendation of the League of <br />California Cities to renegotiate employee contracts to bring the pension Benefits <br />of Classic Members in line with PEPRA Members, for future work. In particular, <br />ensure that the salary used to determine final retirement compensation is based on <br />the average of the final 3 years of employment (rather than highest 1 year), and <br />that the salary is not enhanced by "spiking," such as by including overtime, <br />unused vacation or sick leave, purchases of "air time," and the like. <br />2017-2018 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury 39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.