Laserfiche WebLink
6.1.B. - Page 10 <br />The Cities' shift from centralized to decentralized purchasing systems evolved over time on a <br />local basis, with individual cities responding to the immediate needs and available resources. <br />Regardless of a particular city's path towards decentralized purchasing, cities lost the expertise <br />necessary to negotiate these kinds of savings. Apart from some employees in public works and <br />engineering departments, most purchasing activities are a secondary responsibility for the <br />employees responsible for their department's procurement function.34 While these employees all <br />receive training on municipal purchasing guidelines and policies, they often lack training and <br />familiarity with advanced procurement practices.35 For many cities, training employees in <br />purchasing practices found in a centralized purchasing department is prohibitively expensive. 36 <br />This loss of purchasing expertise has real financial consequences. For instance, most of the <br />Cities' employees are unaware of and untrained in the use of cooperative purchasing databases.37 <br />Cooperative purchasing databases, like the California Department of General Services' (DGS's) <br />State Contracts Index Listing and State Leveraged Procurement Agreements, are databases of <br />pre -negotiated contracts for common goods and services, for prices lower than market .38 By not <br />piggybacking on these pre -negotiated contracts, the Cities miss the opportunity to purchase a <br />wide range of products at lower prices. <br />Employees in decentralized systems often do not identify commonly purchased goods that other <br />departments are also buying and so miss the opportunity to negotiate lower costs which could be <br />obtained by purchasing the items in bulk for multiple departments. 39 While finance officers do <br />track purchases on a departmental level, only the City of San Mateo has a staff position <br />dedicated to tracking the cost, type, quantity, and frequency with which all city departments are <br />purchasing products .40 In cities that fail to track products purchased across multiple departments, <br />finance officers cannot identify goods (like office supplies, furniture, automobile parts) and <br />services (like translators), that could be purchased in bulk through a volume discount contract. In <br />effect, each individual department pays for goods and services at a price that is higher than could <br />be achieved through purchasing at the municipal level.41 <br />Conversely, in centralized purchasing systems a dedicated staff of purchasing agents specializes <br />in securing the lowest prices for goods and services. 42 Purchasing agents have the training, <br />resources, time, and specialization to identify the best vendors and negotiate below-market prices <br />through leveraging their city's market power. 43 Purchasing agents have the authority and <br />capacity to unlock low prices by buying in bulk, authorizing long term contracts, and negotiating <br />volume discounts. Centralized purchasing agents also have acquired specific purchasing <br />34 Interviews with City Finance Officials. <br />31 Interviews with City Finance Officials. <br />36 Interviews with City Finance Officials. <br />31 Interviews with Finance Officials. <br />38 Procurement Division "Leveraged Procurement Agreements (LPAs) California Department of General Services <br />Accessed on April 5, 2018. <httr)://www.des.ca.eov/Dd/Programs/Levera2ed.asnx> <br />39 Money Matters "Centralized & Decentralized Purchase: Suitability, Merits and Detriments" 2018. <br />" Interview with City Finance Officials. <br />41 Ibid. <br />42 Clifford McCue, Jack Pitzer "Centralized vs. Decentralized Purchasing: Current Trends in Governmental <br />Procurement Practices" 2000. <br />43 Ibid. <br />2017-2018 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury <br />