My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2018-09-10 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
AgdaPkt 2018-09-10 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2018 8:39:31 AM
Creation date
9/6/2018 5:49:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
9/10/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
468
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.1.C. - Page 20 <br />have no control over Ca1PERS' determinations and must pay all contribution increases mandated <br />by CaIPERS.10 <br />Importance of Rate of Return on Investment. <br />As noted above, Returns on Investments are the primary funding source for meeting Benefits <br />obligations. Accordingly, annual Returns on Investment achieved by Ca1PERS have a major <br />impact on its ability to fund Benefits payments. As of June 30, 2017, Ca1PERS reported the <br />following annualized net Returns on Investment over different periods of time:" <br />• Past 3 years: <br />4.6 percent <br />• Past 5 years: <br />8.8 percent <br />• Past 10 years: <br />4.4 percent <br />• Past 20 years: <br />6.6 percent <br />Even small changes in Ca1PERS' annual Returns on Investments over the long-term can drive <br />substantial changes in its ability to meet Benefit obligations. For example, if a pension plan had <br />an obligation to pay Benefits of $150 million in 20 years and Ca1PERS projected that its annual <br />Return on Investment over that time would average 7.5 percent, then Ca1PERS would need $35.5 <br />million at the outset to meet that obligation. However, if the actual Return on Investment <br />achieved by Ca1PERS over that period was only 6.5 percent instead of 7.5 percent, then the <br />pension plan would only have $124.4 million available to pay Benefits in the 20th year, 12 a <br />shortfall of more than $35 million on the $150 million obligation. <br />Importance of Discount Rates. <br />To determine the Funded Percentage of a pension plan, Ca1PERS compares the value of the <br />pension plan's assets (Total Plan Assets) to the present value of the plan's Benefits payment <br />obligations (Total Plan Liabilities). 13 If the present value of the Benefits obligations is larger than <br />the current value of pension assets, then the plan is not fully funded and has an Unfunded <br />Liability equal to the difference. <br />In economic terms, the promise to make a future Benefit payment is worth less today than an <br />immediate payment of the same amount. In order to compare the value of a promise to pay a <br />March 2016, p. 1, <httr)://www.ici)mnetwork.com/wr)-content/uploads/2016/05/Rob-Buaer What-Is-the-Biegest- <br />Challene-Faceina-Public-Plan-S_nonsors O_ntional._ndf>. <br />10 Interviews by Grand Jury. <br />11 CaIPERS, Investment & Pension Funding Facts at a Glance for Fiscal Year 2016-17, <br /><httos://www. calDers. ca.2ov/docs/forms-publications/facts-investment-pension-fundin2.Ddf>. <br />" The formula for the 7.5 percent Return on Investment example is: $150 million / ((1.0 +0.075)^20) _ <br />$35,311,972. The formula for the 6.5 percent Return on Investment example is: $35,311,972 x (1.065^20) _ <br />$124,426,856. <br />13 Biggs and Smetters, Understanding the Argument for Market Valuation, p. 1. <br />2017-2018 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.