My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2006-03-27
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2006
>
AgdaPkt 2006-03-27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2006 9:16:07 AM
Creation date
3/23/2006 1:37:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
3/27/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />78 <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />South County Fire Authority removed the downtown San Carlos engine company <br />(E 13) completely in late 2004. The San Carlos engine company on The Alameda <br />(E16) is operating at the Basic Life Support level (no paramedic) most of the <br />time. Although isolated and infrequent, they were also forced to close stations. <br /> <br />The City of San Mateo removes the downtown engine company (E21) from <br />service frequently in a configuration similar to Redwood City, but their model <br />removes the company at night more frequently than in Redwood City. San Mateo <br />anticipates returning E21 to full-time status in FY 06/07 representing a <br />reinstatement cost of more than $700,000.00. <br /> <br />The City of San Bruno continues to "cross-staff' (one crew staffs two units and <br />moves back and forth) their main station engine company and truck company. In <br />order to meet current budget constraints, if this procedure was used as the only <br />strategy, San Bruno Fire would have to cross-staff 100 to 120 shifts per year. <br />The cross-staffing model is still a net loss of one fire company. San Bruno will be <br />utilizing a combination of strategies so that they are not concentrating the budget <br />cut accommodation on the cross-staffing model. <br /> <br />The completion of major projects in downtown Redwood City promise a far different <br />experience than the current theater located on East Bayshore. The new theater location <br />is not only larger, but will generate longer visitor stays in the downtown and will <br />encompass multiple linking activities such as shopping, dinner, and a movie or <br />entertainment at one of the other venues. The significance of this from an emergency <br />response standpoint is that the daytime and nighttime population will be greater than <br />what we currently experience, and this greater population in the downtown will equate to <br />more calls for service. Staff is not familiar with a metric that can be used to correlate <br />visitor population with calls for service because of many independent variables, be we <br />do expect additional call volume. <br /> <br />Analysis <br />Redwood City Fire monitors response time performance and utilizes this information as <br />an annual performance measure. Our response time performance target is 5 minutes. <br />Response time deteriorated during the first year (2003) of E9 service reductions (from 5 <br />minutes, 85% of the time, to; 5 minutes, 82% of the time). Response time performance <br />stabilized at the 82% level in calendar years 2004 and 2005. When compared to 2003, <br />the number of incident responses that did not meet the 5 minute response target <br />increased by an average of 3% (164 call average during each year for 2004 and 2005) <br />city-wide. As a reference, the 5 minute response target was missed for 1348 calls in <br />2005 and 1361 calls in 2004. <br /> <br />Turnout time remained fairly constant during this same period (a range of 71 seconds to <br />74 seconds between 2001 and 2005) so the implication is that travel time is the factor <br />that changed. Two variables effect travel time; road conditions (which includes traffic) <br />and/or distance. The distance that a fire company has to travel is increased when the <br />first-due company is not available for their own call and the next-closest company has to <br />respond from farther away. The reduced capacity of E9 is probably one of the factors in <br />this average increase in response times. The calls evaluated were within the jurisdiction <br />of the Redwood City Fire Department and did not include response into other <br />jurisdictions, but the effects of cuts in neighboring jurisdictions may have also influenced <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.