My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2006-03-27
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2006
>
AgdaPkt 2006-03-27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2006 9:16:07 AM
Creation date
3/23/2006 1:37:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
3/27/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />LOCAL OFFICIALS BRIEFED ON GOVERNOR'S <br /> <br />STATE OF EMERGENCY PROCLAMATION FOR <br /> <br />CALIFORNIA'S LEVEE SYSTEM <br /> <br />On Monday, February 27, the governor's office <br />briefed a number of city and county officials about <br />the details of the governor's recent Emergency <br />Proclamation to repair 24 identified critical erosion <br />sites on project levees located in Sacramento <br />Colusa, Solano, Sutter, Yolo and Yuba countie~ <br />before the start of the next flood season. <br /> <br />The director of California's Department of <br />Water Resources (DWR), Lester Snow, began <br />the conference call briefing by explaining the <br />process for selecting the 24 critical sites. These <br />sites were identified by the Army Corps of Engi- <br />neers, with cooperation from the State Depart- <br />ment of Water Resources. Many city and county <br />o~ials participating in the call expressed appre- <br />Ciation for the governor's actions. <br /> <br />Without the emergency proclamation, officials <br />from the Schwarzenegger Administration esti- <br />mated that it would take about three years to <br />repair the erosion sites. With the proclamation, <br />they hope to complete the job by the end of this <br />year. Given the recent heavy rains and increased <br />chances for flooding, the administration indicated <br />that delaying repairs could put the whole state at <br />risk. <br /> <br />The governor has sent a joint letter with <br />California Sen. Dianne Feinstein to President <br />Bush requesting federal funding to assist in the <br />levee repair. <br /> <br />During the conference call, several partici- <br />pants inquired about other potential projects that <br />are not among the 24 slated for action. Director <br />Snow responded that inquiries and information <br />about such projects should be sent to his office. <br />Cities with concerns about other potential critical <br />sites in their area may contact Debbie Deanne of <br />DWR at (916) 653-7007. <br /> <br />For more information, links to the proclama- <br />tion, list of sites and a map of affected areas, <br />please visit the governor's website at <br />'tfflW.Çlovernor.ca.gov. <br /> <br />9A <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />CALED ANNUAL CONFERENCE IN APRIL <br /> <br />The California Association for Local Economic <br />Development (CALED) will hold its 26th Annual <br />Conference & Spring Training on April 24-26, at the <br />Wyndham Palm Springs Hotel, in Palm Springs. <br /> <br />This year's theme is "California - A Great <br />Place to be in Business!?!?!?" The conference <br />features a keynote address that will examine the <br />state's manufacturing. Entitled "California's <br />Manufacturing - Is it Declining, Growing, or Trans- <br />forming?" the address will begin with welcoming <br />comments at 9 a.m. on Monday, April 24, kicking- <br />off the three-day event. <br /> <br />A number of topics will be featured at the daily <br />sessions. including manufacturing, building, <br />technology, and much more. The cost for this <br />event is $495 until March 15 for everyone. After <br />that date, CALED members pay $595, while non- <br />members pay $695. For more information (includ- <br />ing a draft agenda) and to register, visit the <br />CALED website at www.caled.ora. <br /> <br />........................ <br /> <br />PROPOSITION 81 - LIBRARY BOND <br />ON JUNE 2006 BALLOT <br /> <br />Lost in some of the discussions about the <br />infrastructure bonds is the fact that one infrastruc- <br />ture bond already is scheduled to be on the June <br />2006 ballot. <br /> <br />Proposition 81, a $600 million general obliga- <br />tion bond to fund library construction, was placed <br />on the ballot by the Legislature in 2004 by 5B 1161 <br />(Alpert). $300 million of the bond would be allo.- <br />cated to those library proposals that were deemed <br />eligible, but for which funding ran out during the <br />last library bond. The remaining $300 million would <br />be for new proposals. <br /> <br />The League is in support of Proposition 81. In <br />addition, the League believes that the library bond <br />should remain on the June ballot and not be <br />delayed to the November ballot. At this time, no <br />one seems to be talking about moving the bond to <br />November. <br /> <br />PAGE 2 . PRIORITY FOCUS <br />March 3, 2006 . Issue #9 <br /> <br />VIsit the League's Official Website..www.cacities.org <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.