Laserfiche WebLink
<br />9A <br />Page 30 <br /> <br />5B 1754 from page 1 .............................................. <br /> <br />The measure is an outgrowth of discussions <br />on housing solutions conducted over a year and a <br />half by the League's Housing/General Plan Task <br />Force. The bill would create a voluntary pilot <br />project with local-state partnership to provide high <br />density housing through the creation of 100 <br />housing/infill infrastructure investment districts <br />statewide. <br /> <br />The projects must be consistent with regional <br />planning objectives and allow construction of more <br />than 500 units of housing with average net density <br />of 25-40 units per acre, with 15 percent of the <br />housing affordable to low and moderate income <br />families. (Visit www.cacities.ora/billsearch and <br />search for S8 1754 League for a League spon- <br />sored background summary.) <br /> <br />"We see this measure as a positive approach <br />to encourage cities to build the kinds of infill <br />projects so many of our cities need, Ð said San <br />Diego Council member and League Second Vice <br />President Jim Madaffer, who served as chairman <br />of the Housing/General Plan Task Force. "It's <br />wor1ds away from the 'hammer and stick' ap- <br />proach that we so often see from the State Capi- <br />tol." <br /> <br />sa 1754 Establishes Funding Mechanism <br />for Services, Infrastructure <br /> <br />"Whenever cities consider building new <br />housing, they face the challenge of identifying <br />funding to pay for increased services and infra- <br />structure needs," Madaffer explained. "New <br />residents mean that you need more parks, more <br />schools, more streets and more cops and <br />firefighters. <br /> <br />"This bill creates financing districts for cities <br />that want to build housing and apply for the volun- <br />tary program, and uses tax-increment financing to <br />help pay for these expenses. Locals contribute, <br />as does the state, by authorizing tax-increment <br />financing for these purposes. <br /> <br />"Ifs a chance to build partnerships at all levels <br />of govemment, to achieve our shared goal of more <br />affordable housing and greater density. <br /> <br />"With the Legislature's failure to pass an <br />infrastructure bond package, the S8 1754 ap- <br />proach becomes even more important for cities," <br />Madaffer added. "Cities can't afford to wait sev- <br />eral years to address our local infrastructure <br />needs. We need solutions now." <br /> <br />League Urges City Support for sa 1754 <br /> <br />There are early signs that the positive, collabo- <br />rative approach taken in S8 1754 is likely to win <br />broad-ranged support. The League urges cities to <br />review the measure and submit letters of support <br />to the Senate Local Government Committee prior <br />to their April 5 hearing. <br /> <br />Please be sure to send a copy of your <br />letter to League Policy Analyst Genevieve <br />Morelos via e-mail at gmorelos@cacities.org. <br />Genevieve can also be reached by phone at <br />(916) 658-8254. <br /> <br />To view a copy of the measure, check on the <br />hearing schedule or obtain other information, <br />please visit the Bill Search section of the League's <br />website (www.cacities.org/billsearch). If you have <br />questions on this measure, contact League <br />Legislative Director Dan Carrigg via e-mail at <br />dcarrigg@cacities.org, or by phone at (916) 658. <br />8222. <br /> <br />Cities Should Also Review sa 1800 <br />(Ducheny/Cedillo): Bill Set for Senate/ <br />Trans/Housing April 4 <br /> <br />Cities are encouraged to closely review SB <br />1800 (Ducheny/Cedillo), an expansive land use bill <br />that will have many implications for local govern- <br />ments. Although this proposal contains some <br />concepts that were explored in League Housing/ <br />General Plan Task Force discussions with <br />homebuilders, the League board of directors <br />ultimately rejected this approach last year as <br />being overly restrictive of local land use authority, <br />and its "one-size-fits-all" approach. <br /> <br />Continued on Page 9 <br /> <br />PAGE 8 . PRIORITY FOCUS <br />March 17,2006 . Issue #11 <br /> <br />Visit the League's Official Website..www.cacities.org <br />