My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2018-09-24 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
AgdaPkt 2018-09-24 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2018 5:18:32 PM
Creation date
9/20/2018 5:27:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
9/24/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
448
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.A. - Page 5 <br />located in the downtown area. The report recommends the implementation of an urban <br />recreational corridor, including the proposed corridor stretching from the Downtown <br />Library to the Highway 101 Undercrossing. <br />After considering existing conditions studies, community input and public opinion, <br />analysis of downtown parking usage and future plans described in Attachment 1, and <br />land surveys, SERA developed high-level site plan diagrams that reflect community - <br />informed programming and amenities. <br />Staff recommends that the City Council proceed to a detailed design phase of the three <br />selected sites to create a large, linear park. If the three sites were to develop in <br />accordance with the diagrams in the report, concurrently with the development of the <br />101 undercrossing and a version of the proposed bicycle network in the City-wide <br />Transportation Plan, the City would capture an opportunity to create a new urban <br />recreation corridor that would greatly contribute to the existing and future network of <br />great public open spaces. <br />Staff is requesting that the City Council provide direction on the City -owned site or sites <br />that should proceed to the Design Phase for a Downtown Park. The Design Phase <br />would require the assembly and release of a Request for Proposal (RFP) for <br />professional design services for the design of an urban park(s) and recreation corridors, <br />including a comprehensive and inclusive public engagement strategy. <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />The City Council could direct staff to assess other parcels, consider an extension of the <br />study, or choose not to consider a park in the Downtown area at this time. <br />FISCAL IMPACT <br />The report in Attachment 2 includes cost estimates for site improvements at each <br />location: <br />1. Library Lot A, Recommended and Alternate Options (both are same estimates): <br />$1.7M - $2.5M for construction <br />2. Citv Hall/Main Street Lot, Recommended Option: $2.6M - $3.4M for construction <br />Citv Hall/Main Street Lot, Alternate Option: $1.9M - $2.OM for construction <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.