My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2018-10-01 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
AgdaPkt 2018-10-01 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2018 9:21:59 AM
Creation date
9/27/2018 4:55:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
10/1/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Government Code Section 7507 requires the City to secure the services of an actuary <br />to provide a statement of the actuarial impact upon future annual costs, including <br />normal costs and any additional accrued liability, before authorizing changes in public <br />retirement plan benefits or other postemployment benefits. Additionally, at least two <br />weeks before changes are considered for adoption, the City is required to make public <br />at a public meeting the actuary’s determinations. This report allows the City to comply <br />with this requirement for the PSA, which has tentatively agreed to modifications to <br />retiree health benefits, and for any other bargaining groups which may agree to such <br />modifications in the future. Upon adoption of any changes, the City Manager must <br />acknowledge in writing that she understands the current and future cost of the benefit <br />as determined by the actuary. <br /> <br /> <br />ANALYSIS <br />The City is working toward fully funding its retiree health obligations by increasing <br />annual payments to the City’s retiree health fund and by working with its bargaining <br />groups to address the existing shortfall. By creating a second tier with lesser benefits, <br />the City is decreasing the cost of the other post employment benefits (“OPEB”). The <br />City is also making a correction to the MOU language that describes Tier One which <br />applies to current employees. The new language more accurately describes the current <br />benefits paid by the City. Although the correction is not an enhancement, the change in <br />language may be perceived as an enhancement. As a result, as a precautionary <br />measure, the City is following the procedures described in Government Code Section <br />7507. <br /> <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />The City Council can reject the proposed changes and direct staff to negotiate different <br />proposals with the applicable bargaining units. <br /> <br /> <br />FISCAL IMPACT <br />Attachment 1 to the staff report provides a total assessment of the positive financial <br />benefit to the City if all employee groups adopted the second tier retiree health <br />proposal. If this were to occur, the present value of the City’s savings over the lifetime of <br />current active employees is estimated to be $2.4 million. The annual savings for all <br />employee groups is estimated to be $262,000 in FY 2018-19 and would increase over <br />time. Attachments 2 – 9 assess the financial impact by each group of employees. <br /> <br />As noted above, at this time only the PSA has tentatively agreed to the City’s proposed <br />changes to retiree health benefits. The present value of the City’s savings over the <br />8.A. - Page 3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.