Laserfiche WebLink
<br />community roundtable was held in April 2005, facilitated by the Civic Engagement and <br />Facilitation Program of the Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center. In the course of the <br />evening, the participants generated a considerable volume of input and ideas, drawn from <br />their reactions to three different approaches for water rate increases. The overarching <br />guidelines that the Committee applied to their June 2005 recommendation to the full <br />Council were: <br />. A refinement of the Water Enterprise Guiding Principles <br />. A hybrid approach to rate increases based on community input that was further <br />refined to insure that billing impacts for various customer classifications reflect the <br />Committee's desire for equity and conservation <br />. Confirmation that budgeted expenditures and projected revenues are in balance <br />. Analysis of benchmarking average water bills on the Peninsula - which <br />demonstrates that despite this significant increase, Redwood City remains one of <br />the most cost-effective water retailers <br /> <br />8A <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />On June 6, 2005, the City Council approved the following adjustments to water rates and <br />charges, as recommended by the Committee: <br />. Increased the residential monthly Basic Service Charge from $11.56 to $12.00. <br />. Increased consumption rates from 4% on the life line to 47% on the upper-most rate <br />tiers for large users. <br /> <br />For the adjustments in rates and charges to take effect July 1, 2006, the Utilities <br />Committee has considered the 2005 public input - prior to and subsequent to - the <br />approval of rate increases, and has provided direction to staff on the following basis: <br />. Begin and complete the 2006 rate adjustment process before the affected 60-day <br />billing cycle commences (May 1. 2006), so that public concerns and comments are <br />heard and considered ahead of the period for which water bills may increase (July <br />1, 2006). <br />. Consider the full scope of 2005 public comments and input as fully valid and <br />applicable to Council deliberations for the 2006 adjustments. <br />. Through a continued public hearing (open the hearing April 3 and close it April 24), <br />provide ample time for interested community members to ask questions, provide <br />comments and express concerns on proposed rates and charges increases. <br />. Consider a phased-in shift of debt services costs from water bill "variable" costs <br />(supported by consumption rates) to "fixed" costs (supported by the Basic Service <br />Charge), as revenue bond proceeds are expended on new facilities and recycled <br />water begins to be produced and distributed. The recommended portion of costs to <br />be initially shifted to the Basic Service Charge is 25%. <br />. Be mindful of the need to continue to affect conservation practices by utilizing a <br />tiered, conservation rate structure. Monitor the ratio of revenues derived from rates <br />and from the fixed monthly service charge. The emerging rule-of-thumb in the <br />conservation field is maximum 40% of revenues from fixed service charges. <br />Currently 27% of revenues come from the basic service charge: With the <br />recommended shift of debt services costs, the ratio of revenues coming from the <br />basic service charge changes from 27% to 31 %. <br />. Per the Water Financing Plan, include anticipated wholesale rate increase on July <br />1,2006 from the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, from $1.02 to $1.16 per <br />unit (last year there was no change in wholesale rates). This 14% increase equates <br />to a variable cost increase for Redwood City of $634,000, all of which must be <br />recovered via the consumption rates to customers. <br /> <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />