My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2006-04-03
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2006
>
AgdaPkt 2006-04-03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2016 12:49:42 PM
Creation date
3/30/2006 2:45:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
4/3/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
188
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />INITIAL ANALYSIS FROM 'CITIES FOR <br />HEALTHY KIDS' FOCUS GROUPS RELEASED <br /> <br />A series of four focus groups was conducted in <br />February as part of the League of California Cities' <br />"Cities for Healthy Kids. project. <br /> <br />The focus groups were held in Riverside, <br />Burbank, Berkeley and Fresno, and explored the <br />views of city officials - elected and staff - about <br />using cities as conduits to identify and enroll eligible <br />children in no- or low-income health insurance <br />programs. <br /> <br />A number of observations at the meetings, <br />including the following: <br /> <br />City elected officials and staff believe that <br />cities can playa role in the effort to enhance <br />awareness among parents and families in their <br />communities about the availability of low and no <br />cost health insurance for their children. <br /> <br />. Confident that cities are trusted sources of <br />infonnation that can tap and leverage numerous <br />resources and relationships, focus group partici- <br />pants said that cities can serve as effective con- <br />duits of infonnation on the issue. Further, theY <br />assumed many cities will be receptive to the Cities <br />for Healthy Kids effort because city leaders across <br />the state are becoming increasingly focused on the <br />health and wellness of their residents and are <br />incorporating these values into their city missions or <br />goals. <br /> <br />How to proceed next is the question the League <br />is considering. According to the analysis of the four <br />focus groups, the question resulting from the <br />research project may not be whether to roll out a <br />"Cities for Healthy Kids. statewide effort, but rather <br />how. <br /> <br />Some focus groups participants advocated that <br />the League of California Cities develop pilot pro- <br />grams in a few targeted cities "to see what works <br />and what doesn't work,. while others endorse <br />launching the program as soon as possible to all <br />interested cities. Others recommend doing both <br />simultaneously. <br /> <br />The League's Community Services Policy <br />Committee will review the analysis and make a <br /> <br />9A <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />recommendation to the League board of directors. <br />"Cities for Healthy Kids. is a cooperative project <br />between the League, the California Teachers <br />Association and the California Association of Health <br />Plans, with funding from the WeliPoint Foundation. <br />Visit the Community Services section of the <br />League's website (www.cacities.or9) for a full copy <br />of the analysis from the focus groups. <br /> <br />......................... <br /> <br />INFRASTRucrURE: JUNE DEADLINE <br /> <br />PASSES, NOVEMBER BALLOT TARGETED <br /> <br />The deadline for an infrastructure package to <br />appear on the June ballot has passed. with no <br />consensus among legislators on what that package <br />should ultimately include. Legislative discussions <br />on an infrastructure plan continue however, and <br />there is talk of working to place a package on the <br />November ballot. <br /> <br />Senate Republicans met this week to talk about <br />a bond package that would include funding for <br />transportation, housing, flood protection and <br />education-the points where there was bipartisan <br />agreement on the previous proposals. The Senate <br />Republicans are also consulting Senate Democrats <br />to negotiate a package that would appeal to both <br />factions of the legislature. <br /> <br />In addition, the Big Five (the governor, Senate <br />President pro Tem Don Perata, Senate Minority <br />Leader Dick Ackerman, Assembly Speaker Fabian <br />Núñez and Assembly Minority leader Kevin <br />McCarthy) met March 22 to discuss next steps to <br />placing some sort of bond on the November ballot. <br />Discussions apparently focused on levees, flood <br />control, and transportation. <br /> <br />The governor has made it clear that he is <br />committed to getting money for levees and flood <br />control in a bond. Both the Senate and Assembly <br />have passed bills that include funding for levees <br />ranging from $1 billion to $1.5 billion. <br /> <br />It appears promising that the momentum built <br />up to place an infrastructure package on the ballot <br />continues, although at this point it would be for the <br />November ballot, rather than the June ballot. While <br />it is still unclear what a consensus package would <br />include, it is encouraging that legislative leaders <br />are continuing to work to invest in California's <br />infrastructure. <br /> <br />PAGE 4 . PRIORITY FOCUS <br />March 24, 2006 . Issue #12 <br /> <br />VIsit the League's Official Webs/te-,www,cacities.org <br /> <br />, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.