Laserfiche WebLink
Council Member Howard stated that on April 24 she will bring before Council a <br />very encouraging survey report and information to demonstrate that with a very <br />limited city investment and partners it will be possible to set up a pilot shuttle <br />service for Redwood City. No operation costs, liability or paperwork will be <br />required other than the two agencies coming to Council with updated reports. The <br />cost may be approximately $50,000. the first year and the Transportation Impact <br />funds of $250,000 earmarked for future shuttle service could be used for this <br />purpose. <br />Council Member Aguirre stated that she sees the themes as the overarching <br />guidelines /values from the previous year and do not require. a dollar amount. She <br />further stated that under Downtown Redevelopment from the first session, <br />priorities for her are b) creative, diverse, and affordable housing on transit lines <br />and c) economic development: business retention, business promotion. She <br />explained that because infrastructure is prioritized in so many other areas she <br />would like to vote for economic development, particularly for the businesses that <br />have suffered during the downturn, and also would vote for housing downtown. <br />Council Member Hartnett agreed that the overarching themes reflect the values <br />and areas of concentration and alert the staff to opportunities to be fulfilled in the <br />future. The areas of concern for increase with the limited funds that may be <br />available relates to public safety — at least partial restoration of the service of <br />Engine 9 as downtown further develops. Secondly, a downtown public safety plan <br />that is related to Engine 9 and the police services. He stated that the posted sub <br />points do not allow for him to articulate his interest in the public safety plan for <br />downtown. Regarding transportation infrastructure, with respect to it being a no <br />monetary option, Council needs to advocate for the Woodside Road interchange <br />and Highway 84 so that the Transportation Authority any other revenue source <br />understands it is a City priority. He further stated that to vote for items that require <br />funding would be misleading given the budget situation. <br />Council Member Bain stated that the discussion involves priorities, visions for the <br />future and long term goals as opposed to two -term, two -year budget items and the <br />two are not necessarily compatible with each other. He stated his belief that the <br />outcome will be short term where staff should focus energy and it should be <br />positioned in that way to the public. He advocated for the addition of half time <br />($52,000.) of an assistant traffic engineer position to complete a full time position. <br />He stated the importance for a number of reasons such as taking a closer look at <br />several issues which includes enhancing bicycle /pedestrian friendliness that will <br />help reduce traffic congestion, is complimentary to a proposed shuttle program <br />and will make the city safer. Traffic study around schools and speeders in the <br />neighborhood are areas that residents express concern around. <br />Mayor Pierce stated that one area where enough energy has not been placed is <br />economic development although there is not a dollar amount listed. Another area <br />JOINT CITY COUNCIL /REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MARCH 13, 2006 <br />MEETING MINUTES PAGE 9 <br />MINUTE BOOK NO. 61 <br />Page No. 129 <br />