Laserfiche WebLink
6. 1. E. - Page 28 <br />CONCLUSION <br />Undoubtedly, progress has been made through these ordinances to protect MUH residents by giving <br />them clear, legal rights to seek protection from the dangers of secondhand smoke exposure. At present, <br />the County and eight of its twenty cities have passed MUH smoking ordinances covering 82 percent of <br />the county's multiunit households. <br />However, it is difficult to determine the impact that MUH smoking ordinances have made because the <br />TPP, which could consolidate complaints data across the jurisdictions and look for trend information, <br />has reported only limited success in obtaining such data from jurisdictions. Further, not all jurisdictions <br />with MUH smoking ordinances interviewed by the Grand Jury systematically compile complaints data. <br />As a result, decisions on how best to increase compliance with and enforce the ordinances can be <br />difficult to make. <br />The Tobacco Prevention Program and Tobacco Education Coalition can support compliance by <br />providing signage with a phone number to report violations and reaching out to residents to explain <br />their rights and obligations under the ordinances, as well as assisting jurisdictions with efforts to <br />analyze complaints data. <br />FINDINGS <br />Fl: Since 1967, exposure to secondhand smoke has killed approximately 2.5 million nonsmokers of all <br />ages in the United States. <br />F2: Enforcement officers report that their primary focus when responding to MUH smoking violation <br />complaints is to educate alleged smokers regarding the requirements of the smoking ordinances, and <br />that most alleged smokers report being unfamiliar with the requirements of the ordinance. <br />F3: The Belmont, Brisbane, Daly City, Redwood City, San Bruno, and the County of San Mateo MUH <br />smoking ordinances expressly prohibit retaliation against individuals who report a violation; however, <br />the MUH smoking ordinances for Burlingame, Foster City, the City of San Mateo, and South San <br />Francisco do not. <br />F4: Searches for "smoking" or "smoke" using the website search tool for Burlingame and Daly City 81 <br />do not yield any information regarding their MUH smoking ordinances, whereas the search tools for <br />each of the other jurisdictions with MUH smoking ordinances do. (See Website Content Table below, <br />column F4.) <br />81 City of Burlingame website, accessed June 7, 2018. <hqp://burlin a�g> City of Daly City website, accessed June 7, <br />2018. <http://www.dal3 city.org> <br />2017-2018 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury 14 <br />