Laserfiche WebLink
Honorable V. Raymond Swope <br />Page 3 <br />6.1. E. - Page 51 <br />F9. In all MUH jurisdictions, the issuance of citations for violations of MUH smoking ordinances is <br />limited by the need to (1) observe the violation in progress, (2) see other compelling <br />evidence that a violation had occurred, or (3) have the alleged violator admit to law or code <br />enforcement that he or she had been smoking in violation of the MUH smoking ordinance. <br />Response: The City partially agrees with this finding. An officer or Code Enforcement Officer <br />investigating a landlord in violation of the MUH Ordinance should comply with the <br />three elements described in the finding. In terms of an individual violating the <br />Smoking Ordinance, the City believes an officer observing a person violating the <br />smoking ordinance is itself compelling evidence of a violation. Officers are also not <br />required to obtain an admission of guilt to substantiate a detention or a citation for <br />the infraction. <br />F10. The towns/cities of Colma, East Palo Alto, Half Moon Bay, Menlo Park, Millbrae, Pacifica, Portola <br />Valley, and San Carlos do not have smoking ordinances that restrict smoking in the multiunit <br />residences, except in some common areas. Atherton, Hillsborough, and Woodside have no <br />multiunit housing. <br />Response: The City neither agrees nor disagrees with this finding. The City is not <br />familiar with the smoking ordinances of the jurisdictions listed in the finding. <br />F11. The MUH smoking ordinances for the cities of Brisbane, Burlingame, Daly City, and the County <br />of San Mateo for its unincorporated areas do not prohibit smoking medical marijuana in <br />multiunit housing. <br />Response: The City agrees with this finding as it pertains to the Daly City Smoking <br />Ordinance. <br />F12. The TPP web pages do not include the following information: (a) a summary of residents' rights <br />and obligations under the MUH smoking ordinances in their jurisdictions, (b) links to each <br />jurisdiction's MUH smoking ordinance, and (c) information on how residents of multiunit <br />housing can report violations of MUH smoking ordinances in their specific jurisdiction. <br />Response: The City neither agrees nor disagrees with this finding. The City is not <br />familiar with the TPP web pages. <br />F13. TPP reported limited success in obtaining MUH smoking complaints data from jurisdictions, <br />making it difficult to assess the efficacy of MUH ordinances and develop trend information. <br />Response: The City partially agrees with this finding. The Daly City Police Department <br />has captured little data on MUH smoking violations and therefore does not <br />have enough data to determine the success of the ordinance nor report it to <br />the TPP. <br />F14. The funding allocation from the California Department of Public Health's Tobacco Control <br />Program for TPP increased from $150,000 in FY 2016-2017 to $784,000 in FY 2017-2018. <br />Response: The City neither agrees nor disagrees with this finding. The City is not <br />familiar with the San Mateo County TPP Program. <br />