My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2018-10-22 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
AgdaPkt 2018-10-22 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/7/2018 8:12:49 AM
Creation date
10/18/2018 5:46:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
10/22/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
413
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
+t 1) this would disproportionately harm low income folks the most who already live in <br />neighborhoods in dire need of more housing development <br />+t 2. The city is already threatening to reduce fire and police. Use the money to keep first <br />responders. <br />+t 2 unclear if parking tickets would actually fund officers. That's a lot of tickets per day. Is it <br />really the case that police don't respond to repeated requests for enforcement? <br />+t 1 1 live in a neighborhood w/o driveways only alleys. Everyone uses street parking. We dont <br />need anymore stress, intimidation & ticketing. We already have several mechanisms in place <br />to report problems. <br />+t 1) increase our gov't size even MORE, just to enforce parking regulations? I'm all for police <br />budget to "protect & serve", but not for this. <br />+t i. Parking enforcement officers will not only overly penalize lower income residents whose <br />neighborhoods offer fewer parking options. The enforcement officers will also have to issue <br />enough tickets to fund their own salaries, a self-perpetuating and non -constructive approach <br />to the problem. If, at present, the city has extra revenue from parking tickets, maybe that <br />money should be used to fund police and other essential services. It doesn't usually help <br />problems to just throw more layers of bureaucracy at them. <br />+t 1 this hits lower income more <br />+t i This is a ridiculous use of public funds. <br />+1 2. 1 don't really find this to be an issue in our city and don't want it to impact low income <br />communities. <br />+t 2 if any cars are problematically parked, can't residents just call in and report them? If <br />they're not causing problems then who cares. <br />+t 1. Firstly, ticket revenue would likely not pay for the entirety of the wages benefits and <br />overhead of the city employee(s) needed to do this job. Secondly, I agree that this will affect <br />those least likely to afford a ticket since the target rich problem areas are generally the multi <br />unit neighborhoods. Thirdly, if there are "serious" parking issues like blocking a driveway or a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.