My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2002-09-23
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2002
>
AgdaPkt 2002-09-23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:54:03 PM
Creation date
9/19/2002 3:48:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Special
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/23/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
206
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Legislative Bill Action <br /> <br /> SB 1466 (Alarcon). Contracts for Labor or environmental impact report (EIR) is required for a <br /> Services. SB 1466 exposes public agencies to proposed project, requires lead agencies to <br /> civil penalties and undermines an agency's ability consider mitigation measures prior to project <br /> to determine the lowest responsible bidder. The approval, and makes several changes to the <br /> bill implies that any entity that enters into a labor California Envirenmentel Quality Act (CEQA) for <br /> contract for construction, janitorial or security these specific projects. Since this bill was never <br /> guard services, should know if the contract does negotiated with local government groups, it con- <br /> not provide sufficient funds to allow the contractor tains numerous unresolved procedural issues. <br /> to comply with all labor laws and regulations. S._.~B For instance, the 20-mile notification requirement <br /> 1466 a/so establishes a rebuttable presumption is unworkable in an urban setting. Another major <br /> that the entity entering into a contract for labor or issue of concern is that the bill provides that a lead <br /> services does not violate the provisions of this bill agency may determine that there ara overriding <br /> if the contract contains comprehensive information environmental, public health or safety reasons <br /> about the contractor and its workforce. This based on substantial evidence that the project <br /> rebuttable presumption would be extremely difficult should be approved. Under existing law, a lead <br /> for a public agency to successfully argue. Staff: agency may also make overriding determinations <br /> Natasha Fooman, Status: GovDesk, Position: regarding economic, legal, social and technolegi- <br /> REQUEST FOR VETO. cai or other considerations. SB 1828 appears to <br /> remove a lead agency authority to approve the <br /> project with these overriding considerations and <br /> would infringe upon police powers constitutionally <br /> HOUSING AND LAND USE granted cities and counties that ara necessary to <br /> AB 2292 (Dutra). Preemption of Local protect the public's health, safety, and welfare. <br />- Authority and Properly Rights. AB 2292 re- Staff: Daniel Carfigg, Status: GovDesk, Position: <br /> moves both discretion and authority from local REQUEST FOR VETO. <br /> governments by "locking in" any residential zoning <br /> used to comply with housing element law for years AB 1866 0Nright). Second Units & Density <br /> at a time, and exposing a local government to Bonuses. Eliminating Public Review. Expand- <br /> lawsuits if it is later changed. This is clearly a shift lng Litigation. AB 1866 silences all public discus- <br /> of land use authority to the state, and hampers sion when a homeowner decides to build a second <br /> local ability to respond to changing conditions in housing unit in their backyard, and will require local <br /> their communities. Furthermore, this bill restricts governments throughout the state to rewrite their <br /> the freedom of a property owner to obtain a de- existing ordinances in an attempt to anticipate any <br /> sired down-zoning or rezoning of their property conceivable eventuality, resulting in longer, more <br /> from a local government, and provides an incen- complicated ordinances that will be enforced at <br /> t/ye for litigation by requiring local governments, planning and building counters, leaving applicants <br /> and their tax payers, to pay the attomeys fees of no recourse to appeal decisions to planning <br /> those who sue them.. A sample ~,eto letter for AB commissions and legislative bodies. AB 1866 also <br /> 2992 is available on the League's Web site, allows density bonus law to trump all other local <br /> www.cacities.or.q, under "Priority Issues - Housing policies by prohibiting local governments from <br /> and Land Use." Staff: Daniel Carrigg, Status: applying any local "development standard," defined <br /> GovDesk, Position: REQUEST FOR VETO. as "any ordinance, general plan element, specific <br /> plan, charter amendment, or other local law, policy, <br /> SB 1828 (Burton). Historical Resources. regulation or condition," that will have the effect of <br /> Affected Native American Sites. SB 1828 precluding the development of density bonus units. <br /> requires a lead agency to notify any affected tribe Based on this language, all other public policies <br /> when determining if a negative derJaration or an are given less value when compared with the <br /> <br /> Visit the League's Official Web Site--www.cacities.org PRIORITY FOCUS/PAGE 9 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.