My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2002-09-23
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2002
>
AgdaPkt 2002-09-23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:54:03 PM
Creation date
9/19/2002 3:48:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Special
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/23/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
206
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
sion. Staff: Daniel Carrigg, Status: GovDesk, Therefore, existing law potentially creates a loop- <br />Position: REQUEST FOR SIGNATURE. hole for an owner of a tax credit development that <br /> sells the project prior to the expiration of <br />SB 372 (Dunn). Preservation Interim Loan affordability restrictions. Staff: Daniel Carfigg, <br />Programs. SB 372 creates preservation interim Status: GovDesk, Position: REQUEST FOR <br />loan programs to be administered by the Depart- SIGNATURE. <br />ment of Housing and Community Development <br />(HCD) for the purpose of preserving existing iow- <br />income rental housing. If approved by the voters in ADMINISTRATIVE <br />November, Proposition 46, the Housing Bond sets <br />aside $50 million to be used for the purposes of AB 363 (Steinberg). Public Agency Attor- <br />Iow-income and moderate-income housing "pres- neys. Attorney. Client Confidentiality. AB 363 <br />ervation." In this context preservation means the would permit public agency attorneys to disclose <br />continuation of affordable rents. SB 372 will help confidential attorney-client information without <br />to stem the conversion of existing affordable State Bar sanctions under certain circumstances if <br />housing units to market rate units by ensuring that they follow the procedures established in the bill. <br />available funding is in place to purchase and <br />preserve these units when their owners desire to Staff: Yvonne Hunter, Status: GovDesk, Position: <br />sell these properties. Staff: Daniel Carrigg, REQUEST FOR SIGNATURE <br />Status: GovDesk, Position: REQUEST FOR <br />SIGNATURE. SB 688 (Burton). Tort Un-Reform. Sum- ' <br /> mary Judgment. SB 688 would make changes to <br />SB 1821 (Dunn). Assisted Housing. B existing procedures for obtaining summary judg- <br />1821 states that an apartment owner must notify ment rulings, thus making it harder for cities (and <br /> others) to have frivolous and meritless lawsuits <br />tenants and specified groups of the expiration of dismissed. It would also extend the statute of <br />rental restrictions, and requires the notification to limitations from one to two years for filing a per- <br />include a statement on whether the owner will <br />increase rents upon the expiration of the rental sonal injury lawsuit. Staff: Yvonne Hunter, Status: <br />restrictions. The also clarifies that the existing GovDesk, Position: REQUEST FOR VETO. <br />right of first refusal for specified individuals and <br /> AB 468 (Firebaugh). State Property. Ac- <br />organizations applies to expidng tax credit devel- <br /> cass. Telecommunications. AB 468 attempts to <br />opments in addition to owners that either terminate <br />subsidy contracts or prepay assisted mortgages, allow local agencies to preempt their local zoning <br /> ordinance processes if the plans for the facility fall <br /> within the confines of a three-part test. The facility: <br />In order to help minimize the impact of tenant <br />displacement and to give local governments an 1) will be attached to an existing state building or <br />opportunity to preserve the affordability of the units, structure; 2) does not exceed the height or signifi- <br />current state law requires an owner to give ten- cantly increase the mass of the existing building or <br />ants, the State Department of Housing and Com- structure; and 3) incorporates reasonable design <br />munity Development and the local government standards and stealth technology to reduce the <br />advance notice of any termination of affordability visibility of the facility. Local agencies must ap- <br />restrictions. SB 1821 clarifies the required 12- prove the application without local zoning review <br /> within 60 days, or the plans for the facilities are <br />month notification by a tax credit development <br />owner. The owner of such a project does not automatically approved. If local agencies decide <br />actively terminate a contract but instead is provid- that the application should go through local zoning <br />lng affordable units for an established time frame, review, and the state disagrees, local agencies do <br /> not have any leverage to enforce their zoning <br /> <br />PAGE 12/PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the League's Official Web Site--www.cacities.org <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.