My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2018-11-05 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
AgdaPkt 2018-11-05 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/7/2018 9:58:26 AM
Creation date
11/1/2018 8:30:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
11/5/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
576
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.D. - Page 48 of 70 <br />Proposal Evaluation Form <br />STEP 2 <br />Full Evaluation of Proposal <br />Point Value Definitions <br />5- Excellent — Substantially exceeds requirements <br />4 -Very Good- Meet all requirements <br />3- Good — Meets most requirements <br />2- Satisfactory — Minimally meets requirements <br />1- Unsatisfactory— Requirements essentially not met <br />0- No Response provided <br />Component <br />Weight <br />Possible <br />Total <br />Evaluator's Comments <br />Evaluated <br />Points <br />Points <br />(0-5) <br />(Weight <br />X PP) <br />Pricing: Product <br />Comments: <br />price analysis and <br />discounts proposed <br />25 <br />including favorable <br />pricing for <br />cooperative <br />purchasing <br />Product Line (bv <br />Comments: <br />category): Breadth, <br />10 <br />variety, quality of <br />product line and <br />warranties <br />available. <br />Availability: Product <br />Comments: <br />line offered in <br />indicated coverage <br />10 <br />area, considering <br />geographic <br />distribution <br />limitations, any sub - <br />proposers and <br />coordination of <br />manufacturer and <br />distribution in <br />response. <br />Conformance: <br />Comments: <br />Completeness of <br />proposal and the <br />5 <br />degree to which the <br />Proposer responds <br />to the terms and all <br />requirements of the <br />RFP requirements <br />and specifications. <br />ml <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.