My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2018-11-05 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
AgdaPkt 2018-11-05 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/7/2018 9:58:26 AM
Creation date
11/1/2018 8:30:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
11/5/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
576
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.B. - Page 59 of 366 <br />the presiding officer and, in that case, the City Manager or his/her <br />designee's determination shall be final and binding, <br />The Chief will have five (5) calendar days from receipt of the <br />request to schedule the informal procedure. The informal procedure <br />will take place within thirty (30) calendar days of the date the <br />employee was notified about the punitive action. <br />2. Burden of Proof: The City will bear the burden of proof at the informal <br />procedure. <br />a. If the action beinq appealed does not involve allegations of <br />misconduct Le, allegations that the employee has violated one or <br />more federal state or local laws and/or City or Department <br />re ulationsprocedures, or rules the limited purpose of the <br />procedure will be to provide the employee the oproqunity to <br />establish a record of the circumstances surrounding the action. <br />The Department's burden will be satisfied if the Department <br />establishes that the action was reasonable even though <br />reasonable persons might disagree about whether the action was <br />the best one under the circumstances. <br />b, If the punitive action involves charges of misconduct, (i.e., <br />allegations that the employee has violated one or more laws <br />regulations, procedures, or rules), the Department will have the <br />burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence the facts <br />which form the basis for the charge of misconduct and the burden' <br />of persuasion that the punitive action was reasonable under the <br />circumstances. <br />3. Conduct of Informal Procedure: <br />a. The formal rules of evidence do not apply, although the Chief will <br />have discretion to exclude evidence which is incompetent, not <br />relevant or cumulative or the presentation of which will otherwise <br />consume undue time. <br />b. The parties may resent arguments through documents and <br />statements. <br />c. If the punitive action being appealed is a written reprimand or does <br />not involve a loss of compensation, the parties will not be entitled to <br />confront and cross-examine witnesses. <br />d. Following the presentation of written material and statements, the <br />involved parties may submit closing arguments orally or in writing <br />for consideration by the presiding officer. <br />e. Representation: The employee may be represented by n <br />Association representative or attorney of his or her choice. <br />to <br />78 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.