Laserfiche WebLink
<br />LEAGUE CONCERNS WITH AB 2987 (NUNEZ) <br />The League of California Cities has a number PEG Channels and PEG Support. Local <br />of concerns with AB 2987 (Nunez). Those con- agencies would lose control over the determina- <br />cerns are: tion of the number of public, education and gov- <br /> ernment (PEG) channels needed to properly meet <br />Build Out of Telecommunications Ser- a community's needs. <br />vices. We are concerned that the build out <br />provisions in AB 2987 will not ensure that video Public Rights-of-Way. It is not clear that local <br />services will be equally available throughout a communities would retain their full control over <br />community. The bill allows video service provid- access to local right-of-way. The League believes <br />ers three years to build out video service, and to that the taxpayers' investment in the public right- <br />self-define the area they will service. of-way must be protected with clear city authority <br /> over access to the right-of-way. <br />While they are prohibited from discriminating <br />on the basis of income, they could gerrymander Revenues. AB 2987 does not ensure that <br />their service area and thereby avoid low income cities will be "kept whole" in regard to franchise <br />areas. Local governments will not have the author- revenues. While the bill upholds a city's ability to <br />ity to challenge the adequacy of the service area impose a utility user tax, local agencies appear to <br />"footprint." be prohibited from imposing other local fees and <br /> taxes, such as business license taxes, encroach- <br />Some areas may only be provided satellite or ment permit fees and building permit fees. <br />"another alternative technology" - an option <br />provided in the bill when the video service provider ......................... <br />is not able to physically build out service to all TELECOM IN THE NEWS <br />areas of their service area footprint. The League <br />is concerned that these alternatives may not be Report Reveals Telcos are Targeting Affluent <br />comparable to service offered in other parts of the Communities for Video Services <br />service area. <br /> In a report issued by Broadband Everywhere, <br />Consumer Protection and Customer Ser- an organization founded and backed by cable <br />vice. The bill effectively pre-empts local govern- operators, the organization is claiming that phone <br />ment from adopting and enforcing customer companies are planning to deliver video services <br />service standards for those operators who have in mostly affluent areas. <br />received a statewide franchise. This would create <br />a two-tiered customer service standard, with local Of the telcos' plans to deliver fiber optic video <br />cable operators subject to local customer service technology to approximately 570 towns and cities, <br />standards, and new statewide franchisees exempt only 14 of those have majority African-American <br />from these standards. populations, according to the report, "A Picture is <br /> Worth a Thousand Words." <br />Video Services to Libraries and Schools. <br />Currently, most local franchises require cable For the complete story, visit <br />companies to provide services to schools and www.multichannel.com and search for the article <br />libraries. This bill would eliminate that obligation. titled "Report: Bells Red-Lining with Video <br />As a result, children and community members Services." <br />who can't afford the services at home will lose <br />access to these advanced broadband services. <br />PAGE 2 - PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the League's Official Website--www.cacities,org <br />April 7, 2006 - Issue #14 <br />