Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 6.10 <br /> Wagstaff and Associates . . Contr~ctAmendment Exhibit."A" Page 9 <br /> City of Redwood City Stanford Medical Outpatient Center Project CEOA DocumentatIon <br /> December 14. 2005 Pagl <br /> REVISED TASKS: <br /> TASK 3. SEIR SCOPING <br /> 3.1 Preparation of NOP and Initial Study Checklist' <br /> 3.1.1 Administrative Draft NOP/lnitial Study Checklist (completed) <br /> 3.1.2 Public Release NOPllnitial Study Checklist <br /> 3.2 Planning Commission Scoping Meeting2 <br /> 3.3 SEIR Scope and Content Review Based on Scoping Meeting Input and Responses <br /> to NOP3 <br /> TASK 4. PREPARATION OF DRAFT EIR <br /> 4.1 Administrative Draft EIR <br /> 4.1.1 General Format, Introduction and Summary <br /> 4.1.2 Setting, Impacts and Mitigations. Completion of supplemental setting, <br /> impacts, and mitigations evaluations and write-ups for all nine "focus topic" <br /> chapters in SEIR rather than MND format. SEIR format generally warrants a <br /> setting, impact and mitigation text that is more comprehensive and detailed <br /> than a typical MND text. <br /> 4.1.3 Project Consistency with Local and Regional Plans. Completion and <br /> evaluation of the consistency of the proposed project changes with applicable <br /> local and regional plans, and associated write-up (required for SEIR; not <br /> required for original MND approach) <br /> 4.1.4 CEQA-Required Assessment Conclusions. Completion of evaluation and <br /> write-up describing how the proposed project changes affect the previous <br /> Midpoint Technology Park EIR conclusions with regard to the following CEQA- <br /> required EJR conclusions (not required for original MND approach): <br /> . Growth-Inducing Effects <br /> . Significant Unavoidable Adverse Effects <br /> . Irreversible Environmental Changes <br /> . Cumulative impacts <br /> . Effects Found Not to Be Significant <br /> 4.1.5 Alternatives to the Proposed Action. Completion of an evaluation and write-up <br /> describing how the proposed project changes affect the alternatives <br /> identification and evaluation conclusions in the previous Midpoint Technology <br /> Park EIR. <br /> 4.2 "Screen Check" Draft SEIR (incl. draft Notice of Completion and draft SCH <br /> Environmental Document Transmittal) <br /> 4.3 Public Release Draft SEIR (inc!. final Notice of Completion and final SCH <br /> Environmental Document Transmittal) <br /> 1Added to comply with CEQA Guidelines section 15082, subsection (a) (Notice of Preparation). <br /> 2Added to comply with CEQA Guidelines section 15082, subsection (c) (Meetings), sub-subsection (1), <br /> which states that for projects of statewide, regional or areawide significance, the lead agency shall <br /> conduct at least one seoping meeting pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15206. The project meets <br /> the CEQA definition of a project of statewide, regional or areawide significance. <br /> 3Added to comply with CEQA Guidelines section 15082. subsection (b) (Responses to Notice of <br /> Preparation) . <br /> C:\Documents and SettingslmriardanlDesktoplWagstaff Agreement-Stanford ElRIWagstaff revised scope1.doc <br />