My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res18 15719
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
Res18 15719
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/19/2018 7:59:55 AM
Creation date
12/19/2018 7:59:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
12/3/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
12/03/2018 <br />I*:I:II�Yie\ <br />Neighborhood Compatibility: Guiding Principles <br />1. Streetscape Frontage <br />Maintain a compatible Streetscape frontage through design features such as placement and <br />size of the front entry feature, placement of the garage, width of building massing, front <br />setback depth, and retention of mature landscaping and trees. Guiding principles include: <br />• Garages — Place new garages in locations similar to the pattern common in the <br />neighborhood: <br />o In neighborhoods which have a strong pattern of garages located at the rear of <br />lots behind the house, that pattern should be repeated. <br />o In neighborhoods where the garage is not a prominent feature of the house, <br />provide additional stepbacks from the front fagade so that the garage is clearly <br />secondary to the house. A one -car garage may also be considered. <br />• Building Width — If the immediately adjacent structures have larger than required side <br />yard setbacks (typically for detached garage access) that result in narrower homes, <br />utilize floor plans that also have narrower widths near the front to maintain a consistent <br />streetscape frontage. <br />• Front Entry — In neighborhoods where homes have a clearly defined front entry, the <br />proposed design should also incorporate a front entry feature. <br />o Front entry features should be compatible with the proposed architectural style. <br />o Front entry features should be human scale and not taller than the first floor eave <br />height. <br />• Landscaping— Where appropriate, maintain any existing mature trees and drought - <br />tolerant landscaping pattern. <br />2. Massing and Design <br />Promote massing and design that is compatible with neighboring structures through building <br />placement, roof design, setbacks, and additional second story stepbacks. Guiding principles <br />include: <br />• Building Placement and Design — The existing development pattern for building <br />placement should be considered for the design of the new structure or addition. <br />o Contextual setbacks — Where there is a strong pattern, the proposed structure <br />should utilize front and side setbacks that generally align with structures that front <br />the same street as the proposed structure. In some cases, additional setback <br />beyond the minimum is appropriate. <br />o Orientation - If there is a strong pattern for a specific orientation of the home <br />(garage and driveway location, front entry placement, window placement, second <br />story massing location), consider utilizing similar orientation of the new home or <br />addition. <br />o The design of the house should incorporate architectural features common in the <br />neighborhood. <br />• Massing — Consider the proposed structure in relation to the surrounding houses. <br />ATTY/RESO.0110/CC RESO APPROVING GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR EVALUATING NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY RE50. NO 15719 <br />REV: 11-28-18 PR MUFF NO. 602 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.