Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SENATE LEADER'S STATED <br />INFRASTRUCTURE DEADLINE NEARS <br /> <br />Senate pro Tem Don Perata has stated publicly <br />that an infrastructure package must be passed by <br />early May-before the release of the govemor's <br />revision of the state budget (the "May Revise") and <br />the ensuing heavy budget debates. This would <br />ensure that a package appears on the November <br />ballot and partisan election campaigns begin to playa <br />role in the passage of a bi-partisan legislative pack- <br />age. <br /> <br />Earlier this week, there was speculation at the <br />Capitol that the Senate might vote on an infrastruc- <br />ture package during the Senate's Floor Session on <br />Thursday, April 27. That session, however, concluded <br />without a vote and many legislators have returned to <br />their home districts. <br /> <br />The League continues to hear that there is <br />consensus on several pieces of an infrastructure <br />package including transportation, flood protection, <br />levee repair and education, but details are still being <br />worked out. No language has been available to <br />review. <br /> <br />At the time of this writing, the League is also <br />aware of discussions taking place among Senate <br />leaders regarding funding, and a housing component <br />as well. Democrats have made it clear that this is one <br />of their priorities. <br /> <br />With the governor's May Revise release date just <br />two weeks away, it appears at this point that there is <br />no urgency to vote on a package without ensuring bi- <br />partisan consensus. <br /> <br />You Could Have Your Own <br /> <br />Subscription to <br /> <br />Western City magazine. <br /> <br />Subscribe Today! <br /> <br />Only Western City magazine brings you practical <br />ideas and information you need to know about local <br />govemment in California. Western City magazine <br />presents big-picture policy issues and trends in a <br />format suited for busy professionals, with concise <br />feature articles and in-depth series that explore <br />statewide issues. Stay informed about city issues <br />across Califomia. Subscribe today. Visit: <br />www.westemcitv.com/of. <br /> <br />TELECOM from page 1 ............. <br /> <br />In Congress, the House Energy and Com- <br />merce Committee conducted a mark up of the <br />Communications Promotion and Enhancement <br />Act of 2006 ("COPE") this week and the measure <br />passed out of the Committee. It is headed to the <br />House floor on Thursday, May 4. <br /> <br />Authored by Committee Chairman Joe Barton, <br />R-Texas, and Bobby Rush, 0-111., this measure <br />would establish a national franchise for new <br />telecommunications video providers, regulated by <br />the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). <br />The bill would allow current providers who operate <br />under a local franchise to shift to the national <br />franchise if a competitor began offering service in <br />the same service area. <br /> <br />The panel rejected amendments that would <br />have added language aimed at including build out <br />requirements for telecom providers. The proposal <br />also strengthens anti-discrimination provisions. <br />These include a League-supported compromise <br />amendment by Congresswoman Hilda Solis (0- <br />Calif.) to include build out provisions, which failed <br />on a vote of 33-23. The compromise amendment <br />would have phased build out after five years in a <br />franchise area if a company's service has been <br />subscribed to by 15 percent of the households it <br />reaches. <br /> <br />California representatives on the Committee, <br />Mary Bono (R-45) and George Radanovich (R- <br />19), voted against the build out provision. Without <br />the amendment or similar language, the bill <br />contains no build out requirements. Build out <br />requirements are necessary to ensure all areas in <br />a community will have access to those services. <br /> <br />As Congresswoman Solis indicated in her <br />remarks, "Without this amendment, many neigh- <br />borhoods will not share in cable competition and <br />will risk seeing worse service and higher prices <br />for their existing cable services." <br /> <br />Chairman Barton did agree to somewhat <br />strengthened anti-discrimination provisions that <br />could impose greater restrictions on new video <br />entrants. The anti-discrimination provisions <br /> <br />Continued on Page 5 <br /> <br />Visit the League's Official Website..www.cacities.org <br /> <br />PAGE 4 . PRIORITY FOCUS <br />April 28, 2006 . Issue #17 <br />