Laserfiche WebLink
<br />8A <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />170 feel 930 fee ~ <br />2,500 initial de~sit ---- <br />5,000 initial deposit <br /> <br />. ~~g~~f~~~d~;;:~~ri~~:Jion; 600 fee '---'-------J-' <br />400 for commercial <br />~~oo +'C-EQA feë---"'-------'-¡-~1°0~~itjal de¡;õ-Sft-------~ <br />~-- '=F- .~ <br /> <br />I - ,--=----.,. --'-l1 ,000 i':1..~i§i1 deposit 'I <br />. -----=------,......-- 5, 000 depos,~t._.._,--_...__J <br /> <br />- ;;:: --~ <br /> <br />I <br />--..-- ~7~ore~itial depc)sit-'--=.-J <br />2,500 initial deposit --, <br /> <br />~.05% of building valuation --I <br /> ~ee I <br />",."..',-",,',,"'..~~...200fee(nomap) I <br />!~~O~~~~i~nl~f~~~~~O~rSystem (GIS) - ;~~~~~U~~gmp~rmit base I <br />Fee . I f~____'---1 <br /> <br />,~~f;Ë~:::::~:e ~ -- ..:..... ~ ~~~ <br /> <br />~revioUSIy applicable fee, I <br /> <br />i ~=~~::~~~t~:'SSi" ~~t ~t!=~~::-----l <br /> <br /> <br />. Z()nirîgVeri~cation Letter <br />ZoniD9 Text/Map Amendment <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />i Finance Committee <br />Recommendation <br />$ <br />270 fee <br /> <br />3. Amends Paragraph 3 of Resolution No. 14609 to provide that projects of less than <br />one-quarter acre requiring review under the California Environmental Quality Act <br />(CEQA) pay the full cost of such review, including the costs for City staff as well as <br />the costs for any consultants 1. <br /> <br />Issues <br />In most cases the Finance Committee recommended that the City should charge the full <br />cost for providing the service. The one major exception to this was appeals. The staff <br />costs involved in most appeals is considerable. The average cost to the City of an appeal <br /> <br />1 Finance will bring back at a later date possible justification for an administrative fee on invoices submitted from <br />consultants working on project applications, <br /> <br />2 <br />