Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 7A <br /> Page 2 <br />The City pays the debt service (principal and interest payments) on the Public Finance <br />Authority bonds from the UUT revenues. These payments average around $2.3 million per <br />year. The balance, $5.5 million, is then appropriated for capital projects. Losing $2 million <br />per year of UUT revenues will reduce funding for capital projects by 36% unless another <br />source of funding is identified. <br />Workers' Compensation Self-Insurance Fund <br />At the February 6, 2006 Council priority setting session, staff advised the Council that the <br />City's workers' compensation self-insurance fund had $2.1 million in negative fund equity <br />(liabilities exceed assets by this amount). Although this is a concern, staff views this as a <br />medium to long-term issue as this fund has sufficient cash to finance the liabilities coming <br />due in the current fiscal year and likely each of the next two fiscal years. <br />Our recommendation is to wait until the middle of FY 2006/07 when the next actuarial <br />valuation of this fund is scheduled to be conducted and report back to Council at that time. <br />The possibility exists that the existing liabilities estimated by the actuary may decline by <br />that time due to changes in state laws and programmatic changes implemented by the <br />Human Resources Department. <br />Retirement System Contributions <br />On May 8, 2006 the Council received and acknowledged a report describing changes <br />made by the Board of the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) and the <br />impact upon the City's contributions in FY 2006/07 and future years. Without these <br />changes in the manner PERS amortizes certain unfunded liabilities, the City's required <br />contribution to PERS would be about $1.4 million higher each year and would likely have <br />resulted in staff recommending general fund expenditure reductions. The disadvantage to <br />this change is that it is uncertain when, or if, approximately $41 million of unfunded <br />liabilities in the City's two retirement plans will be paid off. <br />Funding Retiree Health Benefits <br />[Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 45 Other Post Employment <br />Benefits (OPEB)] <br />The City Council Finance Committee recommends that the City Council review the <br />information provided on GASB 45, Other Post Employment Benefits (Attachment II), and <br />begin to develop a strategy for the City's implementation of GASS 45 by fiscal year 2007- <br />08. GASB 45 is similar to previous GASS guidance for pensions in that it requires the <br />recognition of the cost of post employment benefits during the years of an employee's <br />active years of service to the City, and utilizes a calculation referred to as the annual <br />required contribution (ARC) to fund the cost of the benefit. The City currently provides one <br />post employment benefit in the form of health insurance for retirees. This benefit is <br />currently accounted for on a "pay-as-you-go" basis, which means that costs are recognized <br />as health premium payments are made for retirees. Therefore, the City is currently <br />recognizing only the health insurance costs associated with the actual retiree health <br />insurance payments being made, and not recognizing the costs of this benefit which is <br />accruing for active employees. <br />2 <br />. <br />