My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 2001-06-11 Reg
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CC Min 2001-06-11 Reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:37:48 PM
Creation date
3/12/2002 10:41:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
6/11/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A definition of Eminent Domain was provided: "It is the authority for the Agency to acquire <br />property for a purpose that is in a public interest, the agency is required to hold a public hearing on <br />the action, to pay the owner a fair market value after a professional appraisal is done, and to provide <br />relocation systems if in fact the property is acquired and the people needed to move." Clarification: <br />City Staff does not do the professional appraisal. <br /> <br />In the past, Eminent Domain has only been used when there is a clear public purpose, when the area <br />will be improved by the project, and when the private market acting alone is not able to provide the <br />type of project proposed. <br /> <br />Summarizing his presentation, Executive Director Church stated that the purpose of the Fifth <br />Amendment is to extend the date to commence Eminent Domain actions for a period of 12 years, <br />from the current 2002 to 2014. Exempt from Eminent Domain are residences that are zoned <br />residential and with a residence use. However, two classes of situations that are not exempt are: <br /> 1) Residential use house in a commercial/industrial zone; <br /> 2) Vacant lot in a residential zone but without a residential use; <br />All these situations are reviewed by the City Council on a project by project basis, and prior to any <br />action being taken. <br /> <br />The recommendation of a 12-year extension was reiterated because projects take so long to <br />implement. Additionally, the plan amendment is lengthy and costly (approx. $30,000). <br /> <br />Agency's Fiscal Consultant Don Fraser stated that he has worked with the Agency for the last 10 <br />years. Don Fraser guided the City Council through the report especially in regards to the findings. <br />He specifically mentioned that blighting is the primary reason why the Agency exists, and secondly <br />to create affordable housing. From a fiscal perspective the Agency Plan is feasible and will <br />continue to be so for the period of the amendment. According to Don Fraser blight still exists, and <br />by extending eminent domain the City will have the tools to positively impact the conditions that <br />persist. <br /> <br />Agency's Attorney Arnold Kessler, read into the record the following information: <br />"Agency Members received the following documents that have been available for public review at <br />the office of the City Clerk: a) staff report on the Fifth Amendment outlining the procedural steps <br />taking in developing it and offers an analysis of the policy considerations regarding the options of <br />extending Eminent Domain up to a period of 12 years b) presents the City Council with several <br />alternatives c) there are several attachments to the staff report which include the Fifth Amendment <br />itself, and as drafted it would extend the Eminent Domain for 12 years, but it would not change the <br />plan; the second attachment is the ordinance by which the Council will adopt the Fifth Amendment, <br />it also mentions specific clauses in regards to written objections received d) report to the City <br />Council dated June 2001 presented by Don Fraser e) letter dated May 25"', 2001 from Donald A. <br />Wilson objecting to the adoption of the Fifth amendment. <br /> <br />JOINT COUNCIL MEETING June I l, 2001 <br />MINUTES PAGE l0 <br />MINUTES Book No. 58 <br />Page No. 432 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.