Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment 1 <br />6.E. - Page 15 of 16 <br />7.A. - Page 9 <br />o Entitlements <br />• Development Team/Entity <br />• Development Project Experience & Qualifications <br />• Developer/Owner's Mission or Purpose <br />• Project Concept <br />• Financial Capacity (ProForma) <br />o Fund leveraging <br />• Property Management Experience <br />• Estimated Project Schedule (Milestones) <br />• References <br />The Housing and Human Concerns Committee would conduct the initial public review of <br />the proposals received through the NOFA / RFP process. They would determine which <br />proposals most closely meet the City funding priorities, goals and objectives. They <br />would prioritize their recommendations of funds and order of priority for City Council. <br />However, before the recommendations are brought to City Council, the HHCC's funding <br />recommendations would go to the Planning Commission to ensure the projects <br />conceptually conform to the applicable policies of the City's General Plan. <br />City staff will prepare guidance documents and NOFA/RFP application materials to <br />assist Housing Fund applicants. The priorities and process may need to change over <br />time and should be reviewed and amended when necessary. The HHCC conducts a <br />review of the NOFA/RFP and funding guidelines for CDBG, HOME and HSFA each <br />year and could include the Affordable Housing Fund Allocation Guidelines in the review <br />process, and bring recommendations for substantial modifications to City Council. The <br />proposed resolution delegates authority to the HHCC to approve minor revisions to the <br />guidelines with concurrence of the Community Development Director. <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />Some alternatives to the recommendations outlined in the staff report could include the <br />issuance of a NOFA/RFP more frequently than once a year, issuance of a stand-alone <br />NOFA/RFP process for the Affordable Housing Fund (do not combine it with the CDBG, <br />HOME and HSFA process), or using an alternative method for reviewing the <br />applications for funding. <br />FISCAL IMPACT <br />The adoption of the Affordable Housing Fund Allocation Guidelines is an administrative <br />action and has no fiscal impact. <br />124 <br />