|
7.B. - Page 24 of 83
<br />Sums by District Assigned
<br />Redwood City 2018/2019 Public Participation Kit
<br />Ben Packer
<br />Ideal population: 10,974
<br />Counts Pewenta es
<br />Group
<br />Category
<br />1
<br />2
<br />3
<br />4
<br />5
<br />6
<br />7
<br />Unassigned
<br />Total
<br />1
<br />2
<br />3
<br />4
<br />5
<br />6
<br />7
<br />Unassigned
<br />Total
<br />Total
<br />Population
<br />Tot. Pop.
<br />11,000
<br />11,363
<br />11,299
<br />11,009
<br />10,426
<br />11,054
<br />10,664
<br />10,664
<br />76,815
<br />0.73%
<br />73%
<br />17%
<br />2%
<br />5%
<br />-2.82%
<br />24%
<br />63%
<br />2%
<br />8%
<br />24%
<br />63%
<br />2%
<br />8%
<br />T� 26 389 325 35 -548 80 -310
<br />937
<br />0.24% 3.55% 2.97% 0.32% -4.99%
<br />8.54%
<br />Hisp 2,393 873 7,405 3,044 5,388 8,100 2,607 2,607
<br />29,810
<br />33,801
<br />1,907
<br />91255
<br />22% 8% 66% 28% 52%
<br />39%
<br />NH Wht 7,139 5,635 2,186 6,659 3,623 1,864 6,695 6,695
<br />65% 50% 19% 60% 35%
<br />44%
<br />NH Blk 172 224 465 217 409 259 161 161
<br />2% 2% 4% 2% 4%
<br />2%
<br />NH Asn 1,079 4,425 764 887 682 523 895 895
<br />10% 39% 7% 8% 7%
<br />12%
<br />Citizen Voting
<br />Age
<br />Population
<br />Total CVAP
<br />8,144
<br />7,844
<br />5,452
<br />7,981
<br />5,657
<br />4,911
<br />7,863
<br />75863
<br />47,851
<br />11,540
<br />27,771
<br />1,213
<br />6,528
<br />53%
<br />36%
<br />3%
<br />7%
<br />43%
<br />5%
<br />51%
<br />21%
<br />65%
<br />1%
<br />11%
<br />15%
<br />5%
<br />80%
<br />15%
<br />48%
<br />1%
<br />8%
<br />FESP 1,165 645 2,359 1,568 1,580 2,588 1,636 1,636
<br />14% 8% 43% 20% 28%
<br />24%
<br />NH Wht 5,854 4,384 1,925 5,560 3,123 1,779 5,146 5,146
<br />72% 56% 35% 70% 55%
<br />58%
<br />NH Blk 163 255 394 58 124 135 84 84
<br />2% 3% 7% 1% 2%
<br />3%
<br />NH Asn 783 21510 637 649 736 334 879 879
<br />10% 32% 12% 8% 13%
<br />14%
<br />Nov. 2016
<br />Registration
<br />Total Reg. 7,136 6,940 4,413 6,960 4,698 3,633 7,393 7,393
<br />41,173
<br />8,615
<br />3,456
<br />29,102
<br />10%
<br />4%
<br />55%
<br />Latino 1,047 567 1,890 1,311 1,151 1,566 1,084 1,084
<br />15% 8% 43% 19% 25%
<br />21%
<br />Asian -American 431 1,593 275 283 278 197 399 399
<br />6% 23% 6% 4% 6%
<br />8%
<br />Filipino 55658 4,780 2,248 5,367 3,269 1,870 5,910 5,910
<br />79% 69% 51% 77% 70%
<br />71%
<br />Nov. 2016
<br />Voters
<br />Total Voters
<br />5,974
<br />5,761
<br />35358
<br />5,757
<br />3,786
<br />2,740
<br />6,197
<br />65197
<br />33,574
<br />6,432
<br />2,786
<br />24,356,
<br />41%
<br />6%
<br />54%
<br />14%
<br />5%
<br />81%
<br />8%
<br />3%
<br />47%
<br />Latino 814 456 1,380 979 848 1,111 844 844
<br />14% 8% 41% 17% 22%
<br />19%
<br />Asian -American 349 1,267 216 240 227 154 333 333
<br />6% 22% 6% 4% 6%
<br />8%
<br />Filipino 4,811 4,038 1,763 4,537 2,712 1,475 5,020 5,020
<br />81% 70% 52% 79% 72%
<br />73%
<br />Submitter's Comments about the plan:
<br />I think this map makes sense because of the 100+ maps I analyzed (programmatically), this one was the most favorable to the minority voting population when looking at balance across districts. There are 3 majority -minority districts, including 2 majority -minority districts among the Citizen Voting Age Population. It cuts
<br />through various neighborhoods (for example, Districts 3 and 7), which I realize goes against one of the criteria, but this has the effect of making the voting population more heterogeneous and having its representatives accountable for a broader range of issues.
<br />168
<br />
|