My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2019-02-11 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
AgdaPkt 2019-02-11 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2020 10:30:18 AM
Creation date
2/7/2019 5:10:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
2/11/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
679
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Dear Mayor Bain, Vice Mayor Howard, and Members of the City Council: <br />On behalf of the Redwood City - San Mateo County Chamber of Commerce and our Board of Directors, <br />we would Iike to provide some preliminary comment regarding the ongoing process of transitioning from at - <br />large elections to by -districts elections in the City of Redwood City. <br />It has come to our attention, that despite a timeline which indicates at least two additonal public <br />hearings and long -stated opportunities to continue to accept public comment and draft maps, tonight <br />the City Council in fact will be asked to provide firm direction on preferences for existing <br />maps. We hope this does not supersede the communities expectations that a final map will not be <br />selected until early March. <br />But in the spirit of supporting the City Council, City Manager, and City staff through this difficult process <br />which was forced upon our great community, below are initial comments regarding any preliminary direction <br />the City Council may provide to City staff tonight: <br />• Many Chamber of Commerce members, board members and staff are also residents and <br />registered voters in the City of Redwood City, including ourselves; and therefore our <br />engagement is critical to this process. <br />• The concept of respecting the "will of the voters" is an important factor in selecting final maps; <br />therefore, map options which do not place any of the current seven City Council Members in <br />the same district should be given priority. <br />• Downtown Redwood City should not be "splintered" into multiple districts in some form of <br />pinwheel or pie methodology of forming districts. In addition to this approach being legally <br />questionable, the future representation of Downtown Redwood City as a cohesive <br />neighborhood is as important as any other neighborhood in this process. <br />• Redwood Shores should be kept whole in a single district. <br />• Legally risky or failed strategies that have been the subject of litigation in other California cities <br />should be eliminated, including a mix of district and at -large seats, pie shaped districts, or <br />other questionable approaches. <br />We look forward to the ongoing public hearings and continued opportunities for public comment and new <br />maps as promised by the initial timeline. And we appreciate the dedication of the City Council and City staff <br />in addressing the lawsuit and implementing a process of transitioning from at -large elections to by -districts <br />elections in the City of Redwood City which balances the many needs of residents and business and property <br />owners. <br />Sincerely, <br />Josh Pierry <br />2019 Chairman of the Board <br />Amy Buckmaster <br />President & CEO <br />Amy Buckmaster <br />President and CEO <br />Chamber <br />Redwood City -San Mateo County <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.