My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2019-02-11 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
AgdaPkt 2019-02-11 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2020 10:30:18 AM
Creation date
2/7/2019 5:10:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
2/11/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
679
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
all that Redwood City is not for sale, and that you won't let developers generate huge profits on the backs of <br />the people you represent by degrading the city we love. <br />To be sure, many of the perks J. Paul and his minions are offering are worth having. The Blomquist extension <br />has been on the city's wish list for years. We all know housing is woefully inadequate. 10 Million to improve <br />the 101/Woodside interchange would certainly help. And it's nice that he has tossed a few million dollars into <br />pots for children's playgrounds and soccer fields. But at what cost? <br />None of the benefits offered individually or in the aggregate can begin to make up for the short- and long-term <br />damage this project would inflict upon the City. <br />The Gridlock it would create on freeways and city streets alone is horrific enough to reject it, and the solutions <br />offered are only crumbs compared to the additional needs it would create, exacerbating traffic problems and <br />our housing imbalance rather that helping solve these problems. <br />The project would further degrade the natural environment, not lead us into the future, polluting and further <br />clogging the Seaport corridor. <br />Revising the General Plan and zoning to allow this to happen would set a dangerous precedent for other <br />developers looking to profit from similar tactics. <br />We are trusting you to do the right thing for us and future generations. <br />Please reject this EIR as inadequate, misleading, and unworthy, and close the door to any further attempts by J. <br />Paul to buy approval for this monstrous mistake. <br />Best regards <br />Lee Callister <br />Sent from my iPad <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.