My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2019-02-11 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
AgdaPkt 2019-02-11 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2020 10:30:18 AM
Creation date
2/7/2019 5:10:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
2/11/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
679
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Redwood City should not be approving further development in such a flood zone and high risk area for sea <br />level rise! The Harbor View Project is completely inconsistent with these studies and how RWC should work <br />to mitigate risk in the future. <br />Additionally, in the previous studies of the Cargill Project, also, east of RTI 01, the CEQA study showed <br />numerous issues which would impact RWC, and noted that highway 10 l's width cannot be expanded in this <br />area. Significant increased traffic is inevitable, and simply altering on-off ramps to mitigate the impact of <br />4500 new employees is not sufficient: route 101 cannot be widened. Traffic congestion will simply worsen. <br />Major new developments need to be along the public transit corridor of Caltrans at minimum. The council <br />should abide by the General Plan as approved. I request that you do not modify the General Plan to <br />accommodate the Harbor View Project. <br />Sincerely, <br />Judith Borcz <br />Redwood City <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.