My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2019-02-11 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
AgdaPkt 2019-02-11 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2020 10:30:18 AM
Creation date
2/7/2019 5:10:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
2/11/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
679
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CLK-Pamela Aguilar <br />prom: Georgianne Stephen <br />went: Sunday, February 10, 2019 10:09 PM <br />To: GRP -City Council <br />Subject: Draft EIR - Harbor View Project - Comments <br />Dear Mayor Bain and Redwood City Council Members: <br />I am writing to give you my thoughts about the use of the land previously occupied by Malibu Grand Prix. First <br />off let me say, as a person who grew up on the Peninsula, I was saddened to see the Malibu Grand Prix facility <br />go. Growing up here in the 1970's and 1980's young people and families were able to go mini -golfing, bowling, <br />and roller and ice skating without putting our parents in the poor house. Even going to the SF Giant's at <br />Candlestick was an affordable family past time. With the closing of the Malibu Family Fun center the <br />Peninsula residents have little if any affordable opportunities for family entertainment. <br />That being said the one thing for certain that the Peninsula does not need is another high tech office park <br />loading up 101 in Redwood City so that the average speed during commute hours goes from 10 mph to 1 <br />mph. I have lived in Redwood City for thirty years and have seen the downtown go from the aptly named <br />Deadwood City to a thriving, bustling downtown with housing, office buildings and restaurants and shops. For <br />my taste it is sometimes too crowded and I would have thought with that much development approved there <br />would have been some open space added but that is another discussion. My point is that, for the most part, the <br />plan has been effective. There are apartments and high tech offices, Box for example, near public transit and <br />services. That makes sense and I am sure that there are more office buildings proposed under the downtown <br />Aan. <br />The land where Malibu sat is designated for Light Industrial and Industrial Port Related for the most part. This <br />is what it is zoned for and the new owner's knew this when they purchased the land. Based on these facts it is <br />unclear to me why the Council would even be considering the proposal for a massive high tech office <br />complex. The Peninsula is losing light industrial districts by the acre. Just look up and down El Camino and <br />Industrial Boulevard in San Carlos. There are industrial parks being mowed down in favor of hotels which will <br />employ people in low paying jobs and these people can't afford any of the new housing going up in the same <br />areas. I worked in manufacturing in industrial parks along the Peninsula for years but my company moved to <br />Hayward as industrial parks were demolished for high rise offices employing biotech and high tech workers <br />leaving everyone else out in the cold. <br />Remember the tech bust when these companies took over Burlingame's auto row and left buildings vacant for <br />years until recently. A well rounded economy encompasses all types of employment including office, <br />construction, services, retail, etc. We need to plan for everyone and I think that the intent of the original plan is <br />the correct one. Use the old Malibu land for light industrial and support of the thriving economy at the Port of <br />Redwood City. We are one of the lucky cities that have such an asset and the area around our Port should be <br />dedicated to serving the needs of the Port and what may be needed in the future. Once you vote to take that <br />away it is gone for good. The vision of Industrial Port Related zoning as part of the development designation <br />was the right call. Don't reverse a smart decision and replace it with a foolhardy one. <br />Last but not least I challenge you to actually talk to your constituents and see what they think. Tell them that <br />he plan will result in 8,000 tech workers clogging up 101 and Woodside Road. What do you think they would <br />say? Light industrial areas, like where my company started up, are the type of places that people can afford to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.