My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2019-02-25 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
AgdaPkt 2019-02-25 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2020 10:15:52 AM
Creation date
2/21/2019 5:32:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
2/25/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
486
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.A. - Page 76 of 77 <br />Caltrans Design Review: Reauired Studies <br />i Corridor Level <br />Caltrans Design Standard Decision Document (DSDD) <br />Protected Bike Lanes within Shoulder Area (no on -street <br />parking) — includes raised buffer for bikeway protection <br />Lane Widths < 11' <br />NetworkTraffic Analysis <br />Multiple Access Restrictions and Signal Modifications (Existing and Existing + Project Scenario) <br />- NetworkTraffic Analysis <br />EW (Existing and Existing + Project Scenario) <br />Bus Boarding Islands (In -Lane) Document applicable design guidelines <br />(VTA, NACTO, etc.) <br />Am <br />Median Refuges (6) Refer to details in Caltrans Standard Plan A88B <br />Caltrans -approved sight distance study required for <br />longitudinal set back from crosswalk of less than 100' <br />Canopy Trees06v (applicable at PHB locations) <br />Caltrans requires a DSDD if there is a net reduction in <br />shoulder width. Although an on -street parking lane <br />counts as a shoulder, a bikeway with a permanent <br />vertical barrier does not count as part of the shoulder. <br />Documentation will be needed tojustify the variance. <br />Relevant Caltrans support for Class IV bikeways: <br />Relevant Caltrans support for Class IV bikeways: <br />- Refer to Design Information Bulletin Number 89-01 <br />(Caltrans Class IV Bikeway Guidance) as well as guidance <br />from FHWA <br />- Deputy Directive 64-R-2, the Caltrans Complete Streets <br />Policy, requires that the safety and mobility needs of <br />bicyclists are addressed in all projects, regardless of <br />funding where they are legal highway users, which <br />includes EI Camino Real <br />Caltrans Standard of minimum 11 -foot urban lane <br />widths (Index 301.1 of Highway Design Manual) — <br />documentation needed tojustify variance <br />Documentation of circulation changes and impacts to <br />overall delay on EI Camino Real to give city maximum <br />flexibility to pursue multiple phasing options <br />Caltrans is supportive based on multi -modal benefits <br />Caltrans prefers minimum 100'longitudinal setback <br />from intersection or signalized crosswalk. <br />Caltrans Standards require 18" lateral clearance from <br />trunk of tree to face of curb. <br />225 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.