My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2019-02-25 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
AgdaPkt 2019-02-25 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2020 10:15:52 AM
Creation date
2/21/2019 5:32:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
2/25/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
Text box
ID:
1
Creator:
Created:
2/21/2019 5:35 PM
Modified:
2/21/2019 5:35 PM
Text:
http://www.redwoodcity.org/
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
486
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.B. - Page 19 of 122 <br />The City's unfunded pension liability is primarily related to retired or inactive (employees not currently <br />employed by or retired from the City) employees: 60% of the unfunded liability for the miscellaneous plan <br />(non -safety employees) is associated with retired or inactive employees, and 73% of the unfunded liability <br />for the safety plan (safety employees) is associated with retired or inactive employees. <br />The City is not unique in facing these pension challenges, and public agencies across the state, including <br />school districts and state agencies, are facing increasing pension costs. The City began reforming pension <br />benefits in 2011, and statewide pension reform occurred in 2013. Though these efforts provide long-term <br />relief, they are not sufficient to fully fund promised benefits. <br />Unfortunately, no statewide pension reform measures appear to be imminent. As a result, it is up to local <br />government agencies to absorb steeply increasing contributions and to implement other strategies that <br />will help place their pension plans on sound financial footing. <br />On July 17, 2018, the San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury (Grand Jury) released a report entitled, Soaring <br />City Pension Costs — Time for Hard Choices, included as Attachment 5, regarding the increasing pension <br />costs of the cities in San Mateo County. The report attempted to address what actions cities in the County <br />can take to meet current and future pension obligations. Redwood City is already undertaking most of <br />these actions and was commended for these efforts. <br />The Grand Jury report notes that public pension costs are a large component of each city's budget and <br />steep pension cost increases represent a serious threat to public services for all cities. In FY 2016-17, which <br />was the most recent year under review in the report, 20 cities within the County of San Mateo spent a <br />total of $105 million on their pension plans, representing an average of approximately 13.6 percent of <br />their General Fund expenditures. <br />In comparison, Redwood City spent 15.8 percent of General Fund expenditures on CalPERS costs in FY <br />2016-17, which is more than 2 percent above the average annual contribution. Additionally, Redwood City <br />had funded 65.7 percent of pension obligations, which was the second lowest out of the twenty cities in <br />the County of San Mateo. The weighted average funded status of the twenty cities was 70.5 percent. <br />The City Council has taken a proactive and strategic approach to addressing the City's pension liabilities. <br />The City implemented a second tier pension formula in 2011 even before the statewide Public Employee <br />Pension Reform Act (PEPRA) was enacted in 2013. As these newer formulas only apply to recent hires, <br />there has been little immediate impact on the City's total pension costs. However, such changes will <br />reduce future liabilities and costs over the long-term. The City has also negotiated cost-sharing <br />agreements with each bargaining group to ensure current employees pay a greater proportion of pension <br />costs. Employees contribute between 8.0 and 18.0 percent of their salary toward their pension benefits, <br />depending on bargaining unit and pension tier. Although these cost-sharing agreements represent <br />important commitments by City employees to help pay for their pension benefits and assist the City in <br />paying the required annual payments to CalPERS, such arrangements do not provide any additional <br />payment toward the City's unfunded liabilities. <br />In September 2017, the City Council approved establishing a Section 115 pension trust account with Public <br />Agency Retirement Services (PARS) to pre -fund the City's pension obligations over time. An initial trust <br />deposit of $10.5 million was made in January 2018, including $8.8 million from the General Fund and $1.7 <br />million from other City funds, as some employees are budgeted in other funds, primarily the water and <br />wastewater utilities. <br />__M 00000pp— <br />City of Redwood City 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, CA. 94063 Tel: 650-780-7000 www.redwoodcity.org <br />245 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.