Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SB 1800 from page 1............................................... <br />Passage of SB 1800 would double the land in communities that are unable to comply <br />supply, which must be made available through the with various requirements. <br />controversial regional housing needs assessment . Make numerous other changes which <br />process (RHNA), and imposes many other restric- diminish local land use authority. <br />tive requirements on local governments related to <br />planning and development approvals. The bill is Please have your city planner and attorney <br />currently in the Senate Transportation and Housing review this legislation. Letters of opposition <br />Committee. continue to be encouraged. An expanded legal <br /> analysis of the legislation prepared by the League <br />Local governments and environmental groups can be found by looking up SB 1800 using the <br />remain opposed to SB 1800. The author and the League's bill search utility at www.cacities.org/ <br />bill's homebuilder sponsors continue to pursue billsearch. <br />rule waivers that would allow SB 1800 to be heard. <br />In addition, there is always the possibility of the . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />contents being dumped into another vehicle (bill) H.R. 5252 from page 2 <br />later in the legislative session. <br />Among its many changes of concern, SB 1800 legislation unless it is amended to reflect our <br /> concerns with rights-of-way and build out before <br />would: the bill goes to the floor for a vote. <br />. Expand the land supply for housing through Specifically, cities should ask their representa- <br /> the RHNA process from a current five-year tive to: <br /> allocation to a 1 O-year allocation, with <br /> additional comprehensive planning required . Support amendments that maintain <br /> for a 20-year period. local government's ability to enforce- <br />. Increase the scope review of local ele- ment and resolve disputes over their <br /> ments by the State Department of Housing streets and rights-of-way. <br /> and Community Development to include . Support amendments that provide for <br /> infrastructure planning, design guidelines, reasonable build out provisions. <br /> property development standards, and the . Oppose the bill if amendments are not <br /> goals and objectives of other elements of added that would address these <br /> the general plan. issues. <br />. Require site-by-site reviews and exten- <br /> sive planning and engineering to ensure <br /> each residential parcel can be developed to <br /> permit the maximum density allowed by the <br /> density range. <br />. Require a market analysis of each site to FIND A BILL, LEGISLATORS, LEG <br /> ensure that "market factors" will result in COMMITIEE - OR ASK LEG STAFF <br /> development. (Many infilllocations may not <br /> meet these requirements as well as tradi- Visit (and bookmarkl) the League's <br /> tional greenfield developments.) Legislative Resources page <br />. Prohibit denial of a housing development (www.cacities.org/legresources). You'll find <br /> unless a stiff finding can be made accom- a roster and contact information for the <br /> panied by a four-fifths vote. League's legislative staff; the online Bill <br />. Authorize fines of up to $10,000 per day Search program, background materials on <br /> and the appointments of "special masters" lobbying your legislators, and more. <br />PAGE 4 - PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the league's Official Website--www.cacities.org <br />June 2, 2006 - Issue #22 <br /> ,.-."".- --~.."'.'.-" <br />