My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2006-06-19
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2006
>
AgdaPkt 2006-06-19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2006 10:17:41 AM
Creation date
6/15/2006 4:02:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
6/19/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> WHAT WILL AB 2987 MEAN FOR YOUR CITY? <br />The May 26 amendments to AB 2987 only . Revenue Loss. The local government <br />address marginal concerns the League has revenues from franchise fees are in jeopardy in the <br />identified with the bill. The bill does little or nothing current language in the bill. Serious legal flaws <br />to address the core issues for cities. This is remain. In its current form, the bill is a tax under <br />what the bill in its current form will do to 3lQlI.[ the constitution of the state. The language needs to <br />city: be amended to ensure that the traditional local <br /> franchise fee for local government is maintained <br />. Discriminatorv. The bill permits video and not taken over and pre-empted by the state tax <br />service providers to pick and choose the areas in currently in the bill. AJI.2, the bill narrows the <br />a community that they will serve while ignoring definition of "gross revenues" that is the basis for <br />other neighborhoods. Cities support competition calculating local government revenues, likely <br />services in telecommunications, but it has to be resulting in a revenue loss. <br />FAIR TO ALL CALIFORNIANS! Under current <br />law, city officials decide the deployment of video . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />services and have a record with the cable indus- AB 2987 from page 5 <br />try to prove that all areas of a community have <br />been served. Under this law, will AT&T and sign up to join the "No on AB 2987" coali- <br />Verizon be put in charge of protecting the tion, fact sheets, a statement of coalition <br />underserved? principles and other resources. <br />. PEG Channels. Public access to broad. At the end of the day, we all want to achieve <br />casting is not protected. The bill fails to ad- expanded consumer choice and help lower <br />equately protect the community's public, educa- costs-not the illusion of reform or, worse still, <br />tion and governmental (PEG) channels. These more expensive services and less choice. Let's <br />are important assets in a community that permit take the time to do this right! <br />the televising of community events, governmental (See also, "What Will AS 2987 Mean for <br />deliberations and educational opportunities. The <br />current language permits new video service Your City?") <br />providers to ignore this commitment to the com- <br />munity. <br />. New State Bureaucracv Pre-emots <br />Local Franchises. The bill establishes a new Stay Up-To-Date on Bills That <br />state bureaucracy that will grow to regulate what May Impact Your City <br />are essentially local decisions about the deploy- <br />ment of new telecommunications services. In www.cacities.ora/billsearch <br />short, the state is taking over local streets when it Become a regular user of the League's <br />comes to industries providing video services. <br />Have a problem on a local street? Go to Sacra- online Legislative Tracking System. The <br />mento and ask the state to correct it! League's website is your gateway to all the <br /> information you need: bills sorted by subject <br />. State Takes Over Local Riahts-of-Wav. areas, showing the bill history, current <br />This bill fails to adequately protect the taxpayers' status, committee analyses, votes, and <br /> much more. You can even view League <br />investment in public rights-of-way. New market letters of support or opposition, and access <br />entrants, primarily telephone companies, want to the League lobbyist working on the bill. <br />access local streets under rules they have <br />written. <br />PAGE 6 - PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the league's Official Website--www.cacities.org <br />June 2, 2006 - Issue #22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.