My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2019-03-11 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
AgdaPkt 2019-03-11 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2020 10:00:49 AM
Creation date
3/7/2019 5:55:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
3/11/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
483
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
bte 10 of 30 <br />WiwW Dmvgwhkm �� <br />Attachment B <br />National Demographics Corporation <br />The Master Address File, population counts, and Census Block total population counts for each Census <br />Block are correct. The 2010 Census counted each house on the southeast side of Whipple Ave and <br />surrounded by Nevada St, Hopkins Avenue, and Hillview Ave correctly in Census Block <br />060816099001015. This worked because the data compilation is relative to Whipple — and assigned based <br />on a Census employee standing on the street in front of the house. But while the Census counts are <br />correct, the Census ma s are incorrect. <br />Where the problem with the Redwood City districting draft maps arose is when the erroneous Census <br />maps were overlaid with Councilmember addresses. Those addresses were geo-located by NDC using <br />the built-in GIS tools — which do not have the Census mistakes built in. So the Councilmember's house <br />(roughly the star shown above) appeared at the correct spot on Earth, not the correct spot relative to the <br />Census street map. If Whipple Ave was also correctly located, the house would be correctly shown on <br />the southeast side of Whipple Ave (as it appears in the map on the left). But in the Census map (on the <br />right) it appears that Whipple turns and goes behind the Councilmember's house, and that the house was <br />on the west, rather than the southeast, side of Whipple. As a result, on the maps where Whipple Ave is a <br />border of the proposed election district (including 7-013c), the proposed election sequencing erroneously <br />assigned the Councilmember to the western, rather than the southeastern, district. <br />Thankfully the only corrections needed are to change the proposed election sequencing and the <br />appearance of Whipple Avenue in this area. The demographics of each map are correct as originally <br />tabulated. <br />We are happy to answer any additional questions you may have about any of this or to provide any <br />additional information that would be useful. <br />Page 2 <br />205 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.