My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2019-04-08 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
AgdaPkt 2019-04-08 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2020 10:54:06 AM
Creation date
4/4/2019 4:43:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
4/8/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
390
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.B. - Page 34 of 42 <br />Flood and Sea Level Rise Resiliency Agency <br />Frequently Asked Questions <br />Background and Need <br />1. Why is this agency needed? <br />Flooding and erosion are immediate and long-term risks to San Mateo County and its residents. It is <br />estimated that by 2100, over 40% of the County lands, including property with an assessed value of <br />$34 billion, could be adversely affected by flooding and erosional processes related to sea level rise <br />(SLR) and climate change'. By forming or modifying an agency, San Mateo County and its cities <br />would create a unified voice and leverage their combined power to take advantage of existing <br />federal and state money to address coastal and flood issues. <br />2. Why is the agency needed now? <br />A proactive approach is much better than a reactive approach — every $1 spent on mitigation saves <br />an average of $6 in future disaster costs Z. By providing an integrated response, San Mateo County <br />may be able to reduce exposure to future SLR and associated future costs, position the County for <br />available state and federal funding programs, and improve coordination among jurisdictions that are <br />grappling with these issues. <br />3. Why a new agency at all? <br />The issues related to flooding and erosion associated with SLR are enormous, and are beyond the <br />capabilities of a single agency to absorb the responsibility for response and adaptation into their <br />existing missions. SLR crosses jurisdictional boundaries. A new agency would have the following <br />benefits: <br />• Coordinate a more focused and effective response to Flood/Erosion/SLR and Regional <br />stormwater infrastructure improvements <br />• Realize economies of scale for planning, project development and implementation. Implement <br />planning at a regional scale to bridge jurisdictional boundaries <br />• Position the region for State/Federal Funding opportunities to address the issues at the <br />appropriate scale <br />• Leverage expertise among agencies to focus on implementation of large, multi -benefit projects <br />that affect multiple jurisdictions <br />4. If San Francisco protected the area with flood gates at the Golden Gate Bridge, would our sea <br />level rise and flood control issues be resolved? <br />This solution is not technically feasible nor is it desirable from an environmental and economic <br />perspective. Regardless, we do not have a singular voice within the County that could represent the <br />cities and county in any discussion with San Francisco about tidal gates or other regional solutions. <br />The proposed agency would allow the county and cities to participate more effectively in regional <br />' SeaChange Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment for San Mateo County, <br />https://seachangesmc.org/vulnerability-assessment/ <br />' Natural Hazard Mitigation Saves: 2017 Interim Report, www.nibs.org/page/mitigationsaves <br />226 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.