AgdaPkt 2019-04-08 Joint SA PFA - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

8.A. - Page 3 of 40 the transition process to let them know the City Council had extended the process for transitioning to district elections and would be considering revised and new maps, should they wish to provide maps or comment on maps submitted. Analysis Over the last six months, the City Council oversaw an extensive community engagement process and received substantial community comments related to district maps. Many residents expressed preferences for keeping Redwood Shores as a separate and distinct district, retaining the Centennial neighborhood together as part of an overall district, maintaining the Downtown neighborhood as part of an overall district, connecting the East Bayshore neighborhood with the Friendly Acres neighborhood, and connecting the Bair Island neighborhood with the Downtown neighborhood. Feedback also included using Jefferson Avenue and Neighborhood Association boundaries as reference, aligning major roadways together where possible, establishing two majority Latino districts, and choosing a map that allows the Farm Hill neighborhood to vote in 2020. Following the Council's decision to re -open the drafting process, the City's demographer has developed four revised maps to address community concerns (13g, 13h, 21e, 21f.) The revised maps continue to reflect the extensive community input received since September when the City began the district elections transition process, as well as direction provided by the City Council. On March 26, 2019, the City posted the four revised maps including maps 13g, 13h, 21e, and 21f on the City's district elections web page. Community members were encouraged to submit comments on the revised maps, or provide new maps by Saturday, March 30, 2019 by 12:00 p.m. This deadline allowed the City's demographer to review the maps to ensure they are population -balanced and meet other required criteria. The City received two additional community submitted maps (13i and 13j) by the deadline; along with other comments received from community members (Attachment C). On Monday, April 1, 2019, the two new community maps and four new demographer submitted maps were posted on the City's web page. (All other previously submitted maps are also on the city's web page.) This meets the seven-day posting requirement under State law. The City additionally publicized the posting of the revised maps via its weekly e -newsletter on March 29 and April 5, 2019 and through the City's social media platforms. On Thursday, April 4, 2019, this staff report on district elections was published as part of the Agenda packet for the April 8, 2019 City Council meeting on the City's website. The Demographer Revised Focus Maps (13g, 13h, 21e, 21f) provide for district -based elections of seven Councilmembers, and they have at least two districts with a Latino Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP) of 50%+ that are compact and adhere to other districting criteria as discussed below. Map 13g has no pairings of Councilmembers in single districts; the other maps have one or two pairings of Councilmembers in a district. In public comment received on the maps, some individuals expressed interest in establishing three districts that were majority -minority (also called coalition districts). According to the City's demographer, it is not possible to create a third majority -minority coalition district while still meeting other traditional criteria, including compactness and preserving communities of City of Redwood City 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, CA. 94063 Tel: 650-780-7000 www.redwoodcity.ore 237